Alex,
They were responding to my question of auto-downloading, nothing that you
said.
Thank you for clearing this up, it's very difficult to see all the sides of
the puzzle, and I really appreciate the responses...
-Anthony
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Alex Launi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:06 PM, mac_v wrote:
> AFAIK Auto downloads of the updates is far worse!
> 1: user might be using 3G at some point where the downloads cost a lot!
> 2: downloads while i'm watching streaming video content would cause the
> lags in my videos which i would hate.
>
Who said
ajmctaggart wrote:
>
> Again, just a user here...
> However, Windows does give the option to download the updates in the
> background then notify when they've fully downloaded.
>
> Would a behavior similar to this make the "updates on login," option any
> more tempting?
>
AFAIK Auto downloads
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:06 AM, mac_v wrote:
> Alex Launi wrote:
> > I disagree, let's imagine this scenario, together...
>
> >
>
> The whole "dream" assumes that the downloads are already
> downloaded/quickly downloaded...
>
> Consider users with slow connections, so the downloads take time
Alex Launi wrote:
> I disagree, let's imagine this scenario, together...
>
The whole "dream" assumes that the downloads are already
downloaded/quickly downloaded...
Consider users with slow connections, so the downloads take time to be
initially downloaded download is larger the longer the wai
> Awesome, right?
Not sure about what your whole reply meant.
I think that notifying on startup has many disadvantage and it's not
applicable in some cases (kernel upgrades, autologin).
It's not wonder windows why asks for it at the shutdown.
___
Mailin
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Charlie Kravetz wrote:
> What about those who use an autologin? They will never see those gdm
> screens.
>
Like I said, update-manager doesn't go away. It just gets more or less
deprecated for most users. For this small subset we just fallback to current
behaviou
...This was hilarious, sexy librarians and all...
Me personally, I don't have a *huge *issue presenting updates at the
beginning of a log-in sequence. As a user, you know they are there, and you
either ignore or proceed.
I can't help but think though, that when I login to my desktop normally, the
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:09:24 +0200
Alex Launi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:06 PM, tacone wrote:
>
> > Good intent, bad idea.
> >
>
> I disagree, let's imagine this scenario, together...
>
>
> It's Tuesday morning, you get up and turn on your computer. Whilst
> you were fast asleep drea
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:06 PM, tacone wrote:
> Good intent, bad idea.
>
I disagree, let's imagine this scenario, together...
It's Tuesday morning, you get up and turn on your computer. Whilst you were
fast asleep dreaming of sugar plums and sexy librarians Ubuntu packagers
were hard at work
Alex Launi wrote:
> His idea was to do updates at login.
> We could do the checking while you're using, and then if we find them on
- 10 ...!
I hate to be delayed during the startup! and to reboot even before the
work gets started! its a regression to the whole quick start process!
cheers,
mac_
Alex Launi wrote:
> David Siegel also had a really great idea for making updates fun (and it
> also solves the issue of how to handle updates- notification icon or
> pop-under window) at the "install updates on shutdown" discussion. Let me
> preface this with these are his ideas and not mine, I thi
> David Siegel also had a really great idea for making updates fun (and it
> also solves the issue of how to handle updates- notification icon or
> pop-under window) at the "install updates on shutdown" discussion. Let me
> preface this with these are his ideas and not mine, I think they're great
>
I had meant to chat with Martin Pitt after his plenary, but never managed to
catch up with him. I forgot about it until I was going through my notebook
the other day. It would be really great if when update-manager presented
itself, some bugs (ones that you reported/subscribed to on LP) had a nice
On 16/06/2009 Natan Yellin wrote:
This relates to an idea I had at UDS about ubuntu-bug, it would be
really sweet if we could tie ubuntu-bug and update-manager together,
so what when a bug you're subscribed to is fixed in an update, you
get some kind of feedback from update-manager.
For m
Forwarding to the list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alex Launi
Date: Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Ayatana] Getting users to care (was Re: [Fwd: Re: Update
manager])
To: Natan Yellin
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Natan Yellin wrote:
> What about trying to e
16 matches
Mail list logo