(5 point exploding heart technique) of course this doesn't include the
actual contacts themselves should they appear in the menu.
In im world when there is someone you don't want to be notified about,
you typically don't want to hear about them at all and so you would right
click there name and bl
"better would be 2 different submit buttons attached to the broadcast input
field.
"Broadcast Status", and "Refresh"."
keep in mind the memenu is a small space and is designed for broad use
(pretty much all pc users) I suggest that there should be no more then 10
things you can click in the menu a
further thought...
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 13:37, frederik.nn...@gmail.com <
frederik.nn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That's what we'd have the "Unlink IM Presence" option for (MeMenu in
> gconf).
>
better would be 2 different submit buttons attached to the broadcast input
field.
"Broadcast Status",
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 13:29, frederik.nn...@gmail.com <
frederik.nn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The MeMenu could be redesigned to support mainly automatic states by the
> following pattern:
> * [ON|OFF] "Do not disturb"
>
defaults to "off".
ON if a fullscreen activity is focused.
Let's stop talkin
lemme rephrase:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 13:01, frederik.nn...@gmail.com <
frederik.nn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But you're right, we could still use the "idle" metaphor, since automatic
> Presence states are equally useful for IM and for system behaviour.
> Then we could fade out the panel to minima
Thought about it again..
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:35, frederik.nn...@gmail.com <
frederik.nn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 03:09, Jan Hopmans wrote:
>
>> On 14/9/2010 00:33, frederik.nn...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Should we add an item high in the Session Menu calle
Hi Jan,
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 03:09, Jan Hopmans wrote:
> On 14/9/2010 00:33, frederik.nn...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Should we add an item high in the Session Menu called "Do Not Disturb"
>> with a checkbox before it??
>>
> You could combine this with the Away, Busy, Offline status. Those mostl
On 14/9/2010 00:33, frederik.nn...@gmail.com wrote:
Should we add an item high in the Session Menu called "Do Not Disturb"
with a checkbox before it??
You could combine this with the Away, Busy, Offline status. Those mostly
include situation where people don't want to be disturbed and would
su
I like the idea of buffering (at least to a point) so the user can
catch up later.
I think the biggest problem to solve for "Silent Mode setup dialog" is
how to populate it. Seems notifications can come and go based on users
installing and uninstalling applications. Also I *really* use the
"Inhibi
Hi Walter,
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 06:44, Walter Wittel wrote:
> Ability to easily switch between two (or a small few) modes (e.g. do
> not disturb except for ... / do not disturb REALLY) with proper
> default might get you to 95% without any further configuration.
>
yeah, for example
* notify
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:39 PM, frederik.nn...@gmail.com
wrote:
> yeah, everything users suggest frequently. It est all common use cases. We
> don't want to create a bloated configuration page.. just the most frequent
> use cases for the beginning.
I've heard this before months ago WRT notifica
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 01:39, frederik.nn...@gmail.com <
frederik.nn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> in an environment in which not even being online can stop the system from
> spamming me with popup alerts about www-related actions that are now
> possible, we need an undisturbed mode that can be activate
Hi Ralph,
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 01:08, Ralph Green wrote:
> On 9/13/10, frederik.nn...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Should we add an item high in the Session Menu called "Do Not Disturb"
> with
> > a checkbox before it??
> >...
> > i think offering an undisturbed session mode is a valid suggestion fo
On 9/13/10, frederik.nn...@gmail.com wrote:
> Should we add an item high in the Session Menu called "Do Not Disturb" with
> a checkbox before it??
>...
> i think offering an undisturbed session mode is a valid suggestion for a
> comfortable experience..
>
I hope you mean everything. It should sto
Should we add an item high in the Session Menu called "Do Not Disturb" with
a checkbox before it??
This would parent everything destraction or disturbance-related.
We could take the further implementation of what DoNotDisturb mode could
mean from there..
some want that to mean "away" in IM, other
15 matches
Mail list logo
