And you intend to understand your target audience's needs without including
it in the discussion?
Marc Lajoie
ps. Where's your science that says that users resist changing their
work-flow based "more [on] ... fear of change and the unknown"? Isn't it
possible their prefe
ng an aesthetically pleasing writing
environment is inspiring. It is not the most logical, efficient possible
layout, granted. But it's pretty, and pretty makes me happy--and being happy
helps me write.
Marc Lajoie
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Lee Hyde wrote:
> On 16/03/11 13:01, Thorsten Wilms
erface to the nuclear reactors intuitive and usable, that's a problem, no
matter what the nuclear engineers say!
Bakers are not the (direct) users of nuclear plants. I will be a direct user
of Ubuntu.
Conversation's the key, baby!
Marc Lajoie
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Paul Sladen
ese. Staying
in a design bubble with your designer friends doesn't necessarily make good
design (from a user perspective). Note: I have great respect for the field
of design; Less for elitism.
Marc Lajoie
ps. I don't mean this as an attack. I just feel I have a right, as a user,
to voic
e an example of using the menu
as an indicator.
Marc Lajoie
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Marc Lajoie wrote on 16/03/11 09:23:
> >...
> > Advantages to current setup: Increases free vert
The community will decide.
Peace, man.
Marc Lajoie
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Mitja Pagon wrote:
> And what may those advantages be? Not every application is a web browser
> and not all applications are the same, so this "trend" Chrome supposedly
> started does not automatica
the title/menu overlap occurring only for maximized windows.
Marc Lajoie
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:59 AM, appi2...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Matthew Paul Thomas
> wrote:
>
>> I see four major problems with hiding the menus and covering them with
>
side would be a time-saver in the long-run.
That's my vote anyways!
Marc Lajoie
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Peterson Silva wrote:
> Yeah I think this is best; the user would find things the way he left them
> =D
>
> *Peterson*
> *http://petercast.net*
>
>
>
>
://unity.exemo.net/5/)?
In the case of a touchscreen device, does clicking the home button recall
the dock?
2) Where's your branch, or a patch so I can try this bad boy out?
Marc Lajoie
ps. Seriously. You rock.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Marco Biscaro
wrote:
> It looks like nice. Very ni
Hey, wow, I see you guys are already way ahead of me on this one.
So how can I help? Is there already some code on this that I can hack on?
Marc Lajoie
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Marc Lajoie wrote
rs in my panel. If they were
combined into one super-indicator(!) I would be very happy.
Multi-lingual users are always left behind in interface design. Usually,
things work very well in one language, but if you need to use two or three
simultaneously, that's when things go wonky!
M
It should also be mentioned that my proposal for the Ubuntu button (clck to
recall, click to flip dock) would also be ideal for tablet/handheld devices
as it would allow the user to recall and interact with the dock using only
the thumb at the edge of the screen.
Another thing worth mentioning is
I love where Unity is going, but there is one part of the interface that
makes no sense to me: the upper-left ubuntu button. I cannot imagine
ever wanting to click it.
Try as I might I cannot find a usage scenario where the dash screen with
the big "shortcut" buttons would be useful. If I want app
13 matches
Mail list logo
