The only way a font would 'break' a website with the Ubuntu font would be if it
"broke" under the libertarian fonts as well.Arial or Helvetica would be the "de
facto standard" for sans. This is talking about making it the Ubuntu font when
it currently isn't either Arial nor Helvetica now anyway
> All five generic font families are defined to exist in all CSS
> implementations
> (they need not necessarily map to five distinct actual fonts). User agents
> should provide reasonable default choices for the generic font families,
> which express the characteristics of each family a
If you prefer, straight from the horse's mouth, so to speak:
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-fonts/#font-family-the-font-family-property
specifically the paragraph on generic font families:
All five generic font families are defined to exist in all CSS
implementations
(they need not necessarily
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Remco wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 22:48, Scott E. Armitage
> wrote:
>> Sorry, but if a website wants to use a specific font, then they should
>> specify that font in the stylesheet. The terms sans-serif, serif, and
>> monospace are keywords that allow the br
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 22:48, Scott E. Armitage
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Remco wrote:
>> This may not be a good idea from a compatibility point of view. Many
>> websites expect sans-serif to mean Arial, serif to mean Times New
>> Roman and monospace Courier New. They expect sent
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Remco wrote:
> This may not be a good idea from a compatibility point of view. Many
> websites expect sans-serif to mean Arial, serif to mean Times New
> Roman and monospace Courier New. They expect sentences they write to
> be in that font, which has a particular
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 21:47, cyrildz wrote:
> Hello Paul,
>
>
> Le jeudi 10 février 2011 à 20:35 +, Paul Sladen a écrit :
>
>>
>> Is your suggestion that we go beyond this, and set "Ubuntu" as the
>> default browser font in Firefox, Chromium, Konqueror, ...?
>
> Yes , this is what I mean,
>
Hello Paul,
Le jeudi 10 février 2011 à 20:35 +, Paul Sladen a écrit :
>
> Is your suggestion that we go beyond this, and set "Ubuntu" as the
> default browser font in Firefox, Chromium, Konqueror, ...?
Yes , this is what I mean,
me too I use it in Firefox (all site render with the Ubuntu
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, [ISO-8859-1] Mart�n A. Casco wrote:
> El jue, 10-02-2011 a las 11:18 -0500, Jason Smith escribió:
> > Hmm this is a good point, maybe 2 or 3 then?
> quickly and simple open a file with right click
Unless the pointer is your finger...
-Paul
__
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, cyrildz wrote:
Hello Ngassam,
> Ubuntu Font are really nice, beautiful,
I'm glad you like the Ubuntu Font Family, and find it practical!
> set the Ubuntu Font as default for all website,
The CSS "font-family: Ubuntu" is already used on the Ubuntu sites, and
additionally it
Well I think that this it's unnecessary, it's more quickly and simple
open a file with right click and select "Open with" instate drug and
drop the file into the launcher and select the app we want.
El jue, 10-02-2011 a las 11:18 -0500, Jason Smith escribió:
> On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 18:10 +0200, R
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 18:10 +0200, Roth Robert wrote:
> Showing only the default app is not the best thing I think, because
> opening the file with the default application can be done by simply
> double-clicking the file. It would be nice to use this possibility to
> show all the apps that can open
Showing only the default app is not the best thing I think, because opening
the file with the default application can be done by simply double-clicking
the file. It would be nice to use this possibility to show all the apps that
can open the file (based on the mime type), and the file would be open
I think showing the default app is the ideal. We could always have it
show in a standard place. There would need to be some design on this one
but it should be possible.
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 15:53 +, Neil Jagdish Patel wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 23:26 +0800, Sam Spilsbury wrote:
> > Hi th
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 23:26 +0800, Sam Spilsbury wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I was having a quick conversation with a few people about the new
> launcher DnD behaviour (highlighting applications which can handle the
> MIME type from the .desktop file). I thought it would be cool to
> extend this behavi
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Shane Fagan
wrote:
> Hey Sam,
>
> If I understand you right you want to allow applications to be opened on the
> file
> by dragging the file to it then im all for it.
This is already implemented.
Rather what I was thinking was that if an application that handles
Hey Sam,
If I understand you right you want to allow applications to be opened on
the file
by dragging the file to it then im all for it. It doesnt sound like a
whole lot of work
to get it working either.
--fagan
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 23:26 +0800, Sam Spilsbury wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I was
Hi there,
I was having a quick conversation with a few people about the new
launcher DnD behaviour (highlighting applications which can handle the
MIME type from the .desktop file). I thought it would be cool to
extend this behavior slightly further so that the launcher will import
the default app
18 matches
Mail list logo
