hi Mohamed,
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 18:03, ilidrissiam...@gmail.com <
ilidrissiam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Hmm... don't like it very much, and mainly because of the menu having
> too much information. The user won't need chat, broadcast, a contact
> list, mail, silent mode and "About me.
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 21:35, fain182 wrote:
> > Now imagine Jane has a new camera and goes on 4 vacations per year.
> > On each vacation, Jane takes several hundred shots.
> > After 3 years, Jane has 4300 photos she made all by herself, he Uncle's
> 200
> > wedding photos not even included.
> >
Hi Jeremy,
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 18:12, Jeremy Nickurak wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 04:37, Conscious User wrote:
>
>> In IM being invisible means that you want the world to treat you like
>> you were offline. That means not sending you anything, regardless of
>> how important it is. Invi
On 16/12/10 12:56, MartÃn A. Casco wrote:
> There is an interesting mail here about unifying Messaging Menu and Me
> Menu... for example, launch empathy (or Pidgin if installed) from
> Messaging Menu, see contacts chats from messaging menu, but if we want
> to set quickly our chat status we have tu
On Dec 20, 2010, at 3:33 AM, femorandeira wrote:
> They gave a number of possible reasons that might explain their
> results. For instance, navigation is more consistent than searching:
> you have to remember the location of the item, as opposed to
> remembering one of the possible multiple way
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 04:37, Conscious User wrote:
> In IM being invisible means that you want the world to treat you like
> you were offline. That means not sending you anything, regardless of
> how important it is. Invisible can be seen as the ultimate maximum
> level of "do not disturb".
>
Hello,
Hmm... don't like it very much, and mainly because of the menu having
too much information. The user won't need chat, broadcast, a contact
list, mail, silent mode and "About me..." at the same time. Maybe we
should have tabs at the top of the menu that brings out each section
when clicked?
> > Right now, the Messaging Menu and MeMenu are kind of connected, in that
> > the functionality of the MeMenu changes by clicks in the Messaging Menu.
> > For example, to get a text box for a broadcast account in the MeMenu,
> > the user has to go to the Messaging Menu to start Gwibber. Furtherm
>
> so.. what could the local relevance of "Invisible" aka "hidden" be?
> is there any?
>
In IM being invisible means that you want the world to treat you like
you were offline. That means not sending you anything, regardless of
how important it is. Invisible can be seen as the ultimate maxim
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:03:12 +0100, Roberto Guido
wrote:
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 13:51 +, femorandeira wrote:
Search is usually
*only* used as a last resource tool when the user can not remember
at
all where he put that document...
I don't agree this.
This is probably true for power-u
+1, I agree... grouping functionality based on scope is a good thing.
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Mirek M. wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> As my requests for having an option to put the Ubuntu button + launcher on
> the right have been received as insignificant feature requests, I'd like to
> expla
On 19 December 2010 17:22, Mirek M. wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> As my requests for having an option to put the Ubuntu button + launcher on
> the right have been received as insignificant feature requests, I'd like to
> explain how Ubuntu button + launcher actually make more sense and improve
> usabil
12 matches
Mail list logo