[Ayatana] Please complete our survey

Hello everyone, Please can you take the time to fill in this survey? http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/36WWXCF At UDS we ran a session discussing how we could increase and manage contributions in the areas of art and design and decided that this survey would be an important source of information

Re: [Ayatana] Graceful degradation of Unity

Metacity does have compositing, and I've read that Docky works with metacity compositing. That could do it, if we need a dock-like interface imitating Unity, but I also think that the classic two gnome-panels is a really good fallback, for legacy users and users who don't like nor the Gnome Shell n

Re: [Ayatana] Graceful degradation of Unity

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 19:18, frederik.nn...@gmail.com < frederik.nn...@gmail.com> wrote: > pss > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 17:45, frederik.nn...@gmail.com < > frederik.nn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Mark, >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 17:35, Mark Curtis wrote: >> >>> Unity requires 3

Re: [Ayatana] Graceful degradation of Unity

I'm actually clueless at this point, but won't the change to Wayland have a huge effect on this? I'm just thinking we're being too quick in some of our criticism :^) Always being on the cutting edge means challenges will arise but it also means some patience is required. --- On Mon, 12/13/10,

Re: [Ayatana] Graceful degradation of Unity

I know it shouldn't be done for now, I said so in the original post "While I understand for this cycle effort should be put into getting Unity functioning, I think for the future a better fallback should be created." > Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:45:30 -0600 > Subject: Re: [Ayatana] Graceful degra

Re: [Ayatana] Graceful degradation of Unity

I don't think it is something that needs to be done now either. I think the ideal time to revisit the idea is probably during the next LTS cycle. That gives Unity time time to mature and become part of the brand identity. If it takes hold, then we should definitely revisit the issue for such an imp

Re: [Ayatana] "fileless" paradigm

Sorry guys if I am a bit late on this, and didn't really follow all the discussion, I just wanted to throw on the table a project by some fellows which might be related and of interest: http://itsme.it/project/ Best, chr On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Felipe Erias M

Re: [Ayatana] Graceful degradation of Unity

pss On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 17:45, frederik.nn...@gmail.com < frederik.nn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 17:35, Mark Curtis wrote: > >> Unity requires 3d compositing. For those without adequate hardware, it >> falls back to the GNOME Panels. While I understa

Re: [Ayatana] Graceful degradation of Unity

What I would do, although this is duplicating effort in the long run, is write a 2d version of unity using EFL, just like they did with the old netbook interface On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Mark Curtis wrote: > Unity requires 3d compositing.  For those without adequate hardware, it > falls

Re: [Ayatana] Graceful degradation of Unity

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Mark Curtis wrote: > Unity requires 3d compositing.  For those without adequate hardware, it > falls back to the GNOME Panels.  While I understand for this cycle effort > should be put into getting Unity functioning, I think for the future a > better fallback shou

Re: [Ayatana] Graceful degradation of Unity

Hi Mark, On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 17:35, Mark Curtis wrote: > Unity requires 3d compositing. For those without adequate hardware, it > falls back to the GNOME Panels. While I understand for this cycle effort > should be put into getting Unity functioning, I think for the future a > better fall

[Ayatana] Graceful degradation of Unity

Unity requires 3d compositing. For those without adequate hardware, it falls back to the GNOME Panels. While I understand for this cycle effort should be put into getting Unity functioning, I think for the future a better fallback should be created. For one the GNOME Panels won't be supported

Re: [Ayatana] Some ideas for the Software Center

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alexander Lancey wrote on 11/12/10 21:24: > > Firstly, sorry if this the wrong mailing list. The right place is . > I've been thinking about the Software Center, and I came up with three > id