basically my logic is this,
close button = no distractions
minimize, notification.
open, open.
close a transfer and when it finishes it creates a notification like an
event.
Of course this reminds me of rhythmbox, which plays music when closed.
something that I know for a fact annoys Windows inco
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 18:29, Dylan McCall wrote:
> This presents a nice opportunity to eliminate a lot of duplicated effort.
>
well put ;)
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 17:56, David Hamm wrote:
> "With a persistent indicator for activity or progress, we can also see,
> when the computer is idle: very important state to be aware of!"
>
> So if i'm downloading something in firebox that computer is still idle
> because it's not in the indica
Look at the current software center. People aren't complaining that there's
no progress menu when they close it. The software center just understands -
like a secretary - that you don't want to be bugged about the task at all.
If I wanted, i could go talk to her. aka open the software center back u
Salomon Sickert worked on this area with a Summer of Code 2010 project for
Gnome.
Lots and lots of information in the wiki page:
http://live.gnome.org/SummerOfCode2010/SalomonSickert_Tasks
This presents a nice opportunity to eliminate a lot of duplicated effort.
Dylan
___
Op maandag 27-09-2010 om 09:02 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef David Hamm:
> Obviously the user wants to see what the progress is, hence a progress
> bar, so why hide it in a menu.
For an action that the user wants or needs to wait for, a dialog window
or other widget with a visible progress bar is
Hi David,
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 18:02, David Hamm wrote:
> Obviously the user wants to see what the progress is, hence a progress bar,
> so why hide it in a menu.
>
putting it in a menu is giving it extra redundant availability, in this case
in a consistent "place", accessible at all times, p
Obviously the user wants to see what the progress is, hence a progress bar,
so why hide it in a menu.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
More help : htt
"With a persistent indicator for activity or progress, we can also see, when
the computer is idle: very important state to be aware of!"
So if i'm downloading something in firebox that computer is still idle
because it's not in the indicator menu? What about 3rd party applications?
"transmission
hello list,
examples of persistent controls, persistent indicators are the new indicator
menus in our panel, me menu, messaging menu, session menu, sound menu.
other examples are the network indicator, which is currently in the
notification area, or the bluetooth indicator.
*"persistent awarenes
for the monochrome indicators we currently have the following mapping:
saturated = active, enabled
unsaturated = inactive, disabled
green = new incoming message
red = warning, alert
in this respect, the network icon is not showing the correct semantics when
you untick "Enable Networking", while o
Or is the attention icon in both the default themes green? :P
My bad... but still taking other themes into consideration this can be a
problem.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Owais Lone wrote:
> Currently the attention state of the indicators or the messaging menu
> solely depends on the icon
Currently the attention state of the indicators or the messaging menu solely
depends on the icon from the current theme. I've noticed that most of the
users miss the attention state after changing the icon theme.
For example, in Ambiance the attention icon for messaging menu is Green and
that for
13 matches
Mail list logo
