On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> On 09/06/10 18:02, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>> Please tell me you are joking. After all the arguments I presented you still
>> think CSD is the road to go? You completely ignore my arguments, you actually
>> have not even read my arguments
Hi everyone!
I see people have already begun to file new bugs as soon as we landed
some new bits today so here are the highlights! Today was the day we
synced up everything in both Maverick and the Lucid Unity PPA, so
everyone should be running the same thing (thanks to the hard work of
the deskto
"David Hamm" wrote:
>and that, ladies and gentlemen is why Mark is Awesome.
>
Could we leave the fanboi stuff off and just deal with the actual issues
please.
Scott K
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.l
and that, ladies and gentlemen is why Mark is Awesome.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
"I just don't understand why having two theme engines is better than one."
"A hung window can still be easily closed when using CSD because the
position of the close button will be known to the window manager and
clicks there handled appropriately even if the client fails to process
them."
"What
On 09/06/10 18:02, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> Please tell me you are joking. After all the arguments I presented you still
> think CSD is the road to go? You completely ignore my arguments, you actually
> have not even read my arguments or you would know that some things like
> closing hung windows
On 09/06/10 19:23, Conscious User wrote:
> Now, I'd feel a lot more confortable if someone steps
> in and says "a hung window can still be easily closed
> when using CSD because of technical reasons X, Y and Z".
>
A hung window can still be easily closed when using CSD because the
position of t
So you would mainly create this API for final users for the file system or
also for the global menu?
I am just a bit concerned that there will be too many windicators
(with consequentially too similar icons). The operations you can do with
files in the filesystem can be so many. I like personaliza
On 11/06/10 10:08, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> The ideal screenshot tool would instantly take a screenshot of the whole
> screen, *and* one of the current window, just in case you wanted either
> of those, and *then* show its own interface giving you the option of
> saving/publishing either of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sense Hofstede wrote on 03/05/10 20:24:
>...
> Without sacrificing usability, clarity and consistency I think that
> the windicators could also make a great place for add-ons. It would be
> only fair to allow e.g. Dropbox to write its own windicator. B
10 matches
Mail list logo