Re: [Ayatana] gnome 3 interface?¿

On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 01:16 +0200, daniel planas wrote: > hello, the design team of ubuntu has improved a great deal about the > GNOME 2 platform. bubble notifications, system tray) but gonme 3 has a > completely different way of working. which will be the adaptation in > ubuntu "gnome shell replac

[Ayatana] gnome 3 interface?¿

hello, the design team of ubuntu has improved a great deal about the GNOME 2 platform. bubble notifications, system tray) but gonme 3 has a completely different way of working. which will be the adaptation in ubuntu "gnome shell replace ayatana changes? how it is being raised? _

[Ayatana] The program shortcuts in the panel look out of place

Since Karmic, but especially now in Lucid, the Firefox, Evolution, and Help icons are starting to look out of place, with every other icon in Lucid's panel being monochrome, unless they need attention. It wasn't this obvious in Karmic, mostly because the Ubuntu Icon still had color: However, now th

Re: [Ayatana] Promoting the LTS

On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Vishal Rao wrote: > I believe "LTS" just means "Long Term Supported" and not necessarily > more or less "stable" :-) During the development cycle for a LTS release, we know that we will be supporting it for a long time. As a result, we are more cautious with the ch

Re: [Ayatana] Promoting the LTS

On 3 April 2010 16:37, Nicholas Ipsen(Sephiroth_VII) wrote: > Reading the Wiki, it sounds a lot like stability is the goal of an LTS. True that, and I think this is for the first time with Lucid? (that the release schedule and wiki were updated?) I wonder if I'm mistaken in reading some forum po

Re: [Ayatana] Promoting the LTS

Reading the Wiki, it sounds a lot like stability *is *the goal of an LTS. >From the Ubuntu Wiki(I've added the red for emphasis): Release Plan Details > >1. > >We are more conservative in our package merge with Debian, >auto-synching with Debian *testing*, instead of Debian unstable.