On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Jan Claeys wrote:
> Op maandag 07-09-2009 om 17:24 uur [tijdzone +0300], schreef Alex
> Lourie:
>> 1. MI will present me the simple *content*-based view of what I've
>> missed;
>> not applications. For example:
>>
>> Email Messages
>> Inbox
>> Gm
On Friday 11,September,2009 04:52 PM, David Barth wrote:
> > It is was not on the table for Karmic, that is, Mozilla had reservations
> > last year about the non-interactivity of n-osd notifications and I think
> > they prefer to see how the rest of the community reacts to our change
> > before rec
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:18:34 +0800 Chow Loong Jin
wrote:
> ... how
>about making the actions optional? For example, don't show actions for
>notify-osd users (where actions aren't supported), but show actions for
>notification-daemon users, much like most of the other applications are
doing.
...
On Friday 11,September,2009 04:52 PM, David Barth wrote:
> It is was not on the table for Karmic, that is, Mozilla had reservations
> last year about the non-interactivity of n-osd notifications and I think
> they prefer to see how the rest of the community reacts to our change
> before reconsideri
mac_v wrote:
> From: David Barth
> To: Steve Dodier
> Cc: ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
> Sent: Wednesday, 9 September, 2009 1:59:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ayatana] Notification consistency
>
> Steve Dodier wrote:
>
>> +1 too, but it'll require Mozilla to natively support libnotify for their
>> Linu
5 matches
Mail list logo
