You might want to read this
http://lifehacker.com/5295449/disable-ubuntus-annoying-update-manager-popup
Alex Launi wrote:
I figured I should start a new thread for this, so that you can all
continue your icon vs. pop-under debate, which is still relevant for
the auto-login case, although it b
Il giorno gio, 18/06/2009 alle 18.25 -0400, Scott Kitterman ha scritto:
> These would also probably need some
> additional QA to reduce the risk for users installing the update with
> no
> chance to consider if it would be a good update for them.
I will trust no human on that :)
If you have a w
> I think the biggest problem with automatic updates is that it puts systems
> at some non-zero risk for the sake of fixing something that probably isn't
> relevant to their systems.
Wonderful point. I don't upgrade my system at all while I'm traveling.
Stefano
__
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:45:39 -0700 Jonathan Marsden
wrote:
>Joshua Blount wrote:
>
>> It may be a good idea, as David suggested, to look past our personal
>> user stories, and look for what most people would find useful.
>
>"Most useful" here is probably somewhat synonymous with "least
>surpris
This discussion has grown big enough for it to deserve several wiki pages
about several points, so it'd be really great to stop splitting it and
changing its name, cause i just can't follow anymore.
PS : sorry for the offtopic :)
___
Mailing list: https:
I'd add, rather than 're brand' the updates, some line of explanation
in the update window or notification may enhance things quite a bit.
In Windows people don't upgrade the system because they know it will
make it slower, or will send their data to some anti-piracy database
or stuff like that.
A
Joshua Blount wrote:
It may be a good idea, as David suggested, to look past our personal
user stories, and look for what most people would find useful.
"Most useful" here is probably somewhat synonymous with "least
surprising". If the target default Ubuntu end user comes from a
Microsoft W
7 matches
Mail list logo
