I fully understand my idea came in a time where everything was
decided, but you have to let people express their vision, only
afterwards you can point out things out.
> We're very interested in morphing windows, so thank you for exploring the
> idea! In general, morphing windows should let us deli
Hi,
Sorry for the long message, must I need to set some context before going
to the point.
I am trying to bring the discussion on update-manger changes, with its
new pop-under behavior to this forum as suggested in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/332945/comments/3
Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
>
> We're very interested in morphing windows,
> Allowing actions on
> notifications means that people HAVE to rush to get to them before they
> expire. We view that as broken by design, so we won't have any actions
> on notifications, and that in turn means there's no
We're very interested in morphing windows, so thank you for exploring
the idea! In general, morphing windows should let us deliver "simpler,
clearer" user experiences, because people are confronted with just the
specific information they need at any given time, and don't get lots of
popup windows
Ajay wrote:
> Perhaps we need "Advanced..." entry / sub-menu in the right click menu.
"Advanced" menu's are sign of conceptual problems and limitations, like
"Other..." menu options. They are *very* difficult for users because
they say "this is hard" which is a disincentive for users to explore
the
I think this is referring to apport, not notify-osd. Notifications are
always temporary, I think the reporter is referring to a dialog that is
displayed by apport when a crash is detected on the system.
If that's the case, then the title of the bug should be amended to
something like "apport dial
6 matches
Mail list logo
