On 16/12/16 09:56, Dale Whitfield wrote:
> Hi George,
>
>> (Am I annoying everyone by using this mailing list as my personal
>> coding blog?)
>>
>
> No. But I speak for myself.
>
> Some of us are interested and reading but don't have time to comment or
> to work through the code.
>
> Your effor
Hi George,
> (Am I annoying everyone by using this mailing list as my personal
> coding blog?)
>
No. But I speak for myself.
Some of us are interested and reading but don't have time to comment or
to work through the code.
Your efforts are appreciated.
> After considerable rearranging (and fi
(Am I annoying everyone by using this mailing list as my personal
coding blog?)
After considerable rearranging (and fixing one nasty logic bug in
the first algorithm posted), I have octal converison working to my
satisfaction.
The logic bug was that I assumed I'd need at most one byte of zero-pad
