Hi
This is to do with binutils but I believe it's OK to discuss it here since it's
more AVR ABI related.
At present, we use first 7 bits (bits 0-6) of e_flags of the ELF header for
specifying the "arch" (ISA variation) and the 8th bit (bit 7) is used for
EF_AVR_LINKRELAX_PREPARED to indicate tha
Hi Vidya,
> I am trying to introduce a new series for Tiny core. As I see 0xx
> series is used for Mega and 1xx series is used for XMega now. If I
> have to have 200 series for Tiny, I need to move the
> EF_AVR_LINKRELAX_PREPARED to a different position.
> I know this will cause binary incompatib
Hi Joerg,
On 9/5/2012 12:25 AM, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
>> I am trying to introduce a new series for Tiny core. As I see 0xx
>> series is used for Mega and 1xx series is used for XMega now. If I
>> have to have 200 series for Tiny, I need to move the
>> EF_AVR_LINKRELAX_PREPARED to a different positio
Vidya Praveen wrote:
While we are on this topic, I was wondering if we should also introduce a bit in
e_flags for -mshort-enums and add a compatibility check. Comments?
There are many other options that change the ABI and might lead to
incompatible objects and potentially wrong code if linked
