On 09/08/12 18:35, Vidya Praveen wrote:
Hi
Since the thread has grown anyway, I'm taking the liberty to reply to this
post.
On 8/8/2012 11:11 PM, Graham Davies wrote:
This is an informative post, I'm pretty certain of my results and I don't
really have a question.
AVR Studio 4.19 does not wor
On 09/08/12 18:32, Weddington, Eric wrote:
-Original Message- From:
avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr- gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org]
On Behalf Of David Brown Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 8:06 AM
To: dva...@internode.on.net
On 09/08/12 19:05, David Kelly wrote:
On Aug 9, 2012, at 11:18 AM, Erik Christiansen wrote:
You should be highly sceptical about using integrated SVN clients
in other programs. It is important that you don't mix major
version numbers of the svn clients on a machine - you'll end up
corrupting
On Mon 30 Jul 2012 04:07:01 NZST +1200, Weddington, Eric wrote:
> There are known issues with LTO and AVR, though unknown reasons why.
Would you have a link to that known issues list?
> For now I would suggest that you avoid that feature.
That's a shame :-(
> However, please file a bug report
On Mon 30 Jul 2012 19:23:25 NZST +1200, David Brown wrote:
> Also note that code size is not the only measure of how good a
> compiler (or option) is. While it is clearly an important measure
> (especially on small systems), sometimes speed is more important.
You've lost me here. What's your exp
On Mon 30 Jul 2012 19:49:15 NZST +1200, Jan Waclawek wrote:
> > Tested with Seismograph 1.8.3,
>
> What is Seismograph 1.8.3?
My Arduino application that I used for this compiler comparison.
Unpublished as of yet because it's still a bit too messy, but it's
intended to be open source and you ca
