Hi!
Couple of years ago, when I was working on AVRs, I have managed to get
basic STL working by enabling proper flags during GCC compilation (for
version 5.4).
Basically, all the and compile time stuff worked just fine without
any issues. With proper insight, I have used all the classes and temp
Hi,
Naturally, much of the C++ standard library isn't remotely suitable for
AVRs, and should not be supported. However, there are a fair amount of
features that I believe would work very nicely, and would be worthwhile
to support. For example, std::array, std::optional, , and the
C++ counterpa
Hey John,
> Naturally, much of the C++ standard library isn't remotely suitable for
> AVRs, and should not be supported. However, there are a fair amount of
> features that I believe would work very nicely, and would be worthwhile
> to support.
I've been playing with the same thought for a while a
Hi,
Naturally, much of the C++ standard library isn't remotely suitable for
AVRs, and should not be supported. However, there are a fair amount of
features that I believe would work very nicely, and would be worthwhile
to support. For example, std::array, std::optional, , and the
C++ counterpa
Hi John,
We already have and , for example, when the freestanding
implementation of libstdc++ is used. You can check in the C++ standard[1] all
we have until now and you also can take a look at the Freestanding Proposal
(p0829)[2] of Ben Craig to know more about what we can have in the futur
