=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Stawicki?= wrote:
> I switched to gcc-avr 4.3.5 and my problems are gone now :)
Then please tell your package vendor about the bug, because
it's one of the more severe bugs. He might either patch it
(backporting the patch from GCC 4.6.x is simple), or just
remove the AVR-
Thanks for you reply,
I switched to gcc-avr 4.3.5 and my problems are gone now :)
Regards
2012/2/7 Joerg Wunsch
> =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Stawicki?= wrote:
>
> > I found a issue in the optimization part of gcc-avr.
>
> This is GCC 4.5.1, but with a patch for bug #46779 (which is only
> fixed in
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Stawicki?= wrote:
> I found a issue in the optimization part of gcc-avr.
If I run your code through my compiler, I get the following assembler
output:
..global _Z1fv
.type _Z1fv, @function
_Z1fv:
push r28
push r29
/* prologue: function */
/* fram
