Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug in GCC 4.8

2012-05-11 Thread Kshitij Kumar Singh
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > [giving up with TOFU] > > You must do something fundamentally wrong... it wasn't that messed up, haha Like I said in my first post, I wasn't using the trunk but a snapshot, (gcc-4.8-20120506.tar.bz2, to be precise) at that time to bu

Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug in GCC 4.8

2012-05-10 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
[giving up with TOFU] You must do something fundamentally wrong... Just configured and smoothly built avr-gcc with $ ../../gcc.gnu.org/trunk/configure --target=avr --prefix=/local/gnu/install/gcc-4.8 --disable-nls --with-dwarf2 --enable-checking=yes,rtl --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-target-o

Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug in GCC 4.8

2012-05-09 Thread Kshitij Kumar Singh
Configure had no issues. But make complained when it was configuring something in the tiny-stack directory about having no exception model . This was weird, cause I thought the good old way was to revert to the set-jump/long-jump model if nothing was specified. IIRC, I had to force this once when c

Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug in GCC 4.8

2012-05-09 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Kshitij Kumar Singh wrote: > Tried building avr-gcc from a snapshot of gcc-4.8-20120506.tar.bz2 on > an i686-pc-mingw32 (gcc 4.6.2). > Ran into the following: > > 1) Forced to use --enable-sjlj-exceptions in configure. Is this > supposed to happen? Ah, I missed this one. What exactly do you mean

Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug in GCC 4.8

2012-05-08 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Kshitij Kumar Singh schrieb: Tried building avr-gcc from a snapshot of gcc-4.8-20120506.tar.bz2 on an i686-pc-mingw32 (gcc 4.6.2). Ran into the following: 1) Forced to use --enable-sjlj-exceptions in configure. Is this supposed to happen? 2) internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.

Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug in GCC 4.8

2012-05-08 Thread Joerg Wunsch
Kshitij Kumar Singh wrote: > PS, I am kinda confused as to which mail list should I post this > (avr-gcc or the gcc bugs). Sorry if this is the wrong list. Since you are using a 4.8 snapshot, I think even the GCC developers list would be OK. But wait a little, maybe Johann also has an idea, as

Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug in GCC 4.8

2012-05-08 Thread Weddington, Eric
Hi, It's ok if you start the conversation here. But the best place to post a bug is in the GCC Bugzilla database: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Eric Weddington > -Original Message- > From: avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org [mailto:avr- > gcc-list-bounces+eric.wed