Please don't forget to "Reply All" when answering on a mailing list.
Thanks.
Juergen Harms wrote:
>> I don't think you should be getting an "unintialised" warning for:
>> extern const int8_t maxModule PROGMEM;
>
> I had tried that - without success. But, thank you, dropping the PROGMEM
> attribu
> I don't think you should be getting an "unintialised" warning for:
> extern const int8_t maxModule PROGMEM;
I had tried that - without success. But, thank you, dropping the PROGMEM
attribute from extern declarations does it - but as you say, a
workaround, not quite clean.
Juergen
_
On 21/08/2012 10:38, Juergen Harms wrote:
On 08/20/2012 10:10 PM, David Brown wrote:
Almost certainly, there is something wrong in your code, or in the way
you have declared your external data - the "-Wuninitialized" flag should
not give false positives as you describe. (It can give false posit
On 08/20/2012 10:10 PM, David Brown wrote:
Almost certainly, there is something wrong in your code, or in the way
you have declared your external data - the "-Wuninitialized" flag should
not give false positives as you describe. (It can give false positives,
when you know yourself that all code
On 20/08/12 16:18, Juergen Harms wrote:
I am presently switching from a rather obsolete version of avr-gcc
(1.6.1, downloaded as a tarball) to a much newer one (4.6.2, available
in an rpm package on my Mageia distribution),
I am having a lot of small-fry but work-intensive problems (risk of
edit
On 20/08/12 19:36, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Juergen Harms schrieb:
I am presently switching from a rather obsolete version of avr-gcc
(1.6.1, downloaded as a tarball) to a much newer one (4.6.2, available
in an rpm package on my Mageia distribution),
avr-gcc started around 2011, with GCC versi
On 08/20/2012 07:36 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Don't rely on unspecified behavior. It's a bad design pattern...
Yes, that has been my original problem (which initially I had not realised).
As a quick fix, I will put individual data structures in separate
sections / modules and determine the
Juergen Harms schrieb:
I am presently switching from a rather obsolete version of avr-gcc
(1.6.1, downloaded as a tarball) to a much newer one (4.6.2, available
in an rpm package on my Mageia distribution),
avr-gcc started around 2011, with GCC version 2.95 or 3.0 or EGCS.
[...] My question
