Hi Andy,
I'm happy to regression-test any gcc patches, if they are send to me
as a MIME-attachment.
They should be relative to the main gcc-directory.
___
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc
Also we need volunteer to run patches for regressions
1) AVR target - I just do execute/torture
2) 686 target - so that proof looks better on primary target
I only have CYGWIN - which is way too slow for testsuite - I think it
takes 2/3 hours for just torture/execute and it would not be better
I don't have any problem. I posted list so as not to forget which I had
fixed and posted
But I cant fix much more unless HEAD catches up. Some of the bug are
same - I found some duplicates but suspect there are more.
I have more fixs than I have posted in the email - but these need other
pro
Hi Andy,
I understand your reluctance against 4.3.0. My problem is that I need to
have support for the new xmega devices. All of that support has been
written for 4.3.0, so I will be releasing the next WinAVR with 4.3.0.
I have your patch for bugs #19636,24894,31644,31786: spill failure ICE.
I ha
