Re: [avr-gcc-list] ATmega256x support

2006-01-25 Thread Martijn van Balen
On 2006-01-25 17:06:34 david wrote: >If I correctly understand your atmega2560 patch with >respect to 3 byte return address - your fix does not >build a version of avr-libc with this support in it? >Meaning that the avr-libc is not build exclusively for >an atmega2560 and won't work on the atmega2

Re: [avr-gcc-list] ATmega256x support

2006-01-25 Thread Martijn van Balen
On 2006-01-24 17:52:57 Uwe Fechner wrote: > >Your patch looks trivial. > >Is changing one line of code of avr.c really all that needs to be done >to make avr-gcc support three bytes per call as return adress? > It seems to be. I've discussed this here before. The only case this matters is function

Re: [avr-gcc-list] ATmega256x support

2006-01-24 Thread Uwe Fechner
Martijn van Balen schrieb: I've just submitted the following patch https://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/index.php?func=detailitem&item_id=4829 This is the code I've used to generate a usable toolkit for myself. It adds support for the 256x devices, limited to the first half of flash (<128KB). It

[avr-gcc-list] ATmega256x support

2006-01-24 Thread Martijn van Balen
Uwe Fechner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2006-01-20 21:41:01: > (Any help to implement support support for the 256k devices is welcome.) I've just submitted the following patch https://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/index.php?func=detailitem&item_id=4829 This is the code I've used to generate a usa