Installing to strange directories

2004-03-11 Thread tomas
Hi, I'm trying to deliver a package (a Zope product) which goes to a strange (from Auto* POV) directorie, something like /usr/lib/zope/lib/python/Products/$name. I'd like to do it with Automake/Autoconf. Is there a canonical way to do it? Or am I supposed to frob $(bindir) or something like that

Advice on autoconfiscating a package

2004-03-22 Thread tomas
Automake gurus, I'm trying to convert a package to using Automake. At first sight it looked easy. It's a Zope product. There's not much to do excepr copying a few files to a target directory (preserving directory structure, which is something like four-deep). There's just one file I have some su

Re: Advice on autoconfiscating a package

2004-03-23 Thread tomas
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:15:04PM +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > >>> "tomas" == tomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [Stupid question] > You must list all Makefiles in AC_CONFIG_FILES, not just the top one. Thanks! You guys rock. -- tomás

Letting user override AC_SUBST values

2004-03-25 Thread tomas
Hi, automake gurus -- here is a configure.ac file: ,--- | AC_INIT(CMSConnector,0.8) | AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE | ZopeProductPath="/tmp/test-zope-install/Products" | ProductName="CMSConnector" | AC_ARG_ENABLE(ZopeProductPath, | [Zope product path], | [Zo

Re: install-sh path, differs?

2004-04-27 Thread tomas
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 12:28:20AM +0200, Alien9 wrote: > don't know the official position, but i made a file in my CVS that's called > autogen.sh > > and that does: > aclocal > autoheader > autoconf > libtoolize -c --automake > automake -a -c Yes, only I call this bootstrap.sh (autogen

Re: Getting web content past distcheck

2004-10-15 Thread tomas
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 06:26:20AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: [...] > This requires you to let $(WEBDIR) default to a directory containing > $(prefix) in its root. For example you could use something similar to > this in your configure.ac: > > WEBDIR=${WEBDIR-\$(pkgdatadir)} Isn't it ${WEBDIR

Re: Getting web content past distcheck

2004-10-17 Thread tomas
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 11:21:18AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 10:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 06:26:20AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: [...] > > Isn't it ${WEBDIR:-\$(pkgdatadir)}? > > ^^^ > Well, ${VAR-VALUE} is correct. (*blush

Re: glade & automake

2004-10-26 Thread tomas
blah... I'd say it's more of an issue for the glade mailing list -- they should know better which versions of auto* go with which versions of glade. HTH -- tomas pgpidppj4QesZ.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: glade & automake

2004-10-27 Thread tomas
ng that gettext > is missing. *blush* You are right, of course. > But I have no experience with glade and cannot predict whether things > will work when gettext is installed. But its easy to try. Makes a lot of sense to try that first, yes. Thanks -- tomas pgp2FP9Jc2Yro.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: question about makefile.in

2005-05-10 Thread tomas
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:54:23AM +0800, zouq wrote: > in the gcc-3.4.1 Makefile.in , > > GTFILES_FILES_FILES = @all_gtfiles_files_files@ > why two "@" used here? > does it have special meaning? Yes, that's right. It is Autoconf's ``substitution markup´´. Patterns like this get substituted for v

Re: conditionally linking to mingw32 library

2005-06-01 Thread tomas
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:44:39PM +0200, Mark Brand wrote: [I'm too dumb to answer that, but...] > Would you please elaborate on the difference between "make variables" > and "substituted values" here? I'm still very new to this. This one I can answer: the "make variables" are those $FOO thing

Re: finding the location of header (.h) files

2006-07-31 Thread tomas
\ -I/usr/include/libglade-1.0 -I/usr/include/gconf/1 \ -I/usr/include/orbit-1.0 (yes, it ain't pretty). So you would first check for the existence of pkg-config (and complain if not there) and then use it to get the info needed. HTH -- tomas signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[HELP!] Seeking auto* enligntenment

2002-10-08 Thread tomas
special case ;-) but I'd like to see a discussion about my general points (whether this leads to my enligntenment or --who knows!-- some improvements on auto-**). Thanks -- tomas

Re: [HELP!] Seeking auto* enligntenment

2002-10-08 Thread tomas
gt; lib/Makefile.am: > > pkglib_LTLIBRARIES = libatb.la > > Is this the entire contents of lib/Makefile.am? Are you expecting > automake to guess which sources make up your library? Yup. That was it. > I'm guessing you need to add > > libatb_la_SOURCES = x.c y.c z.c Completely right. Thanks a million. You saved my day :-) -- tomas

Re: Need help with cleaning up a working GNU Autotools setup

2005-10-09 Thread Tomas Zerolo
, which was made for just this purpose: See <http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Hello.html> <http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/hello/> HTH -- tomas signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

2024-03-31 Thread Tomas Volf
ist' was used, and the resulting artifact not tampered with, even without any central signing. Maybe new `dist-reproducible' automake option which would do two things: 1. Try to make things under its control reproducible (e.g.: set timestamps to 0) 2. `make distcheck' would build the ar

Re: automated release building service

2024-04-01 Thread Tomas Volf
7;s?) instance of such a platform? Have a nice day, Tomas Volf -- There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

cuda compilation

2009-12-29 Thread Tomas Oberhuber
CUDATester.cpp (only in Makefile.am) I get make[2]: *** No rule to make target `../../../src/core/tnlLongVectorCUDATester.cpp', needed by `tnlLongVectorCUDATester.lo'. Stop. so automake now tries to compile it. Can anybody, please, help me and tell me what I am doing wrong? Thanks a lot, Tomas Oberhuber.

Re: cuda compilation

2010-01-02 Thread Tomas Oberhuber
Hello Ralph, On Wednesday 30 of December 2009 22:52:51 Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Tomas, > > * Tomas Oberhuber wrote on Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 07:25:36PM CET: > > I am experiencing some troubles with cuda. I studied mailing lists about > > autoconf, automake and libtool

Re: cuda compilation

2010-01-07 Thread Tomas Oberhuber
$lib' > > _LT_TAGVAR(hardcode_libdir_flag_spec, $1)='${wl}-rpath ${wl}$libdir' > _LT_TAGVAR(export_dynamic_flag_spec, $1)='${wl}--export-dynamic' > fi Now I am able to compile and link my project. However, I had also problems w

Re: cuda compilation

2010-01-08 Thread Tomas Oberhuber
Hi Ralph, Dne středa 06 Leden 2010 08:44:57 Ralf Wildenhues napsal(a): > Hello Tomas, > > * Tomas Oberhuber wrote on Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 11:33:46AM CET: > > Now I try to compile whole project with nvcc. It seems to work but I get > > this > > > > ibtool:

Re: cuda compilation

2010-01-09 Thread Tomas Oberhuber
Hi Ralph again, On Wednesday 06 of January 2010 20:44:57 Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Tomas, > > * Tomas Oberhuber wrote on Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 11:33:46AM CET: > > Now I try to compile whole project with nvcc. It seems to work but I get > > this > > > > ibtool:

error in config.sub

2000-12-19 Thread Tomas Berndtsson
For the MiNT system, the lines in config.sub are wrong. It's missing the '*'-wildcard. I've applied a patch below. Greetings, Tomas --- /usr/share/automake/config.sub~ Sat Sep 2 16:05:51 2000 +++ /usr/share/automake/config.sub Tue Dec 19 17:44:48 2

autoconf bug?

2001-02-08 Thread Tomas Berndtsson
echo "$ac_t""no" 1>&6 { echo "configure: error: *** Zen does not function properly without dlopen sorry." 1>&2; exit 1; } fi fi done That works as expected. I can't see that I've done anything wrong in the quoting, but maybe I have? Greetings, Tomas

Re: autoconf bug?

2001-02-09 Thread Tomas Berndtsson
Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Feb 8, 2001, Tomas Berndtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > My autoconf version is 2.13. m4 is GNU m4 1.4. > > I have the following in my configure.in: > > > AC_CHECK_FUNCS(dlopen, , AC_CHECK

Re: autoconf bug?

2001-02-09 Thread Tomas Berndtsson
Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Feb 9, 2001, Tomas Berndtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't see why I need that, but I tried, and it still didn't > > work. > > In this case, you may have found a bug in autoconf. Th

Is it possible to extend the built-in dependency tracking?

2025-07-18 Thread Tomas Volf
a script to generate the dependency files). Connected question, can I use the $(DEPDIR) macro in my rules and expect it to keep working, or -- since it is not documented -- it could be removed in some future release? Thank you and have a nice day, Tomas Volf -- There are only two hard things in

Re: Is it possible to extend the built-in dependency tracking?

2025-07-27 Thread Tomas Volf
Hi, thank you very much for your message. Karl Berry writes: > Hi Tomas - thanks for writing. As far as I know, there is nothing in > Automake to support extension of dependency tracking by users to new > languages. Unfortunately. > > If it's possible for you to add dep

Re: Is it possible to extend the built-in dependency tracking?

2025-07-27 Thread Tomas Volf
Hello, thank you very much for your response! It helped me a lot. Nick Bowler writes: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 05:24:31PM +0200, Tomas Volf wrote: >> I am looking into how to add a dependency tracking into the build >> process of my project. The project is written in GNU Gu

Re: Is it possible to extend the built-in dependency tracking?

2025-07-28 Thread Tomas Volf
e a rule per the .go file I actually want to compile. However I cannot shake the feeling I am over-engineering it a bit at this point. Tomas -- There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.

Re: Is it possible to extend the built-in dependency tracking?

2025-08-02 Thread Tomas Volf
t. I am still at least trying to stick to POSIX make, but will keep this as an option, thank you. :) > [..] > > Just my guesses towards a solution, Thank you, it is much appreciated. ^_^ Tomas -- There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation, naming things