Re: automake -vs- huge projects

2003-12-16 Thread Thomas Fitzsimmons
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:49:44 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: > Tom Fitzsimmons (CCd) has been working on upgrading libgcj to use > newer auto* tools. This has gone swimmingly, except one problem with > automake. > > A little background. libgcj is pretty big. It has 2,243 ".java" > files at the moment

Re: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch)

2003-12-30 Thread Thomas Fitzsimmons
On Sat, 2003-12-27 at 21:25, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > >>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > adl> 1999-11-22 Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > adl> > adl> * automake.in (handle_single_transform_list): Generate explicit > adl> rule for s

Re: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch)

2004-01-03 Thread Thomas Fitzsimmons
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 16:39, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Tom" == Thomas Fitzsimmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [ suggestions ] > > Tom> Anyway, this patch brings us closer to using automake-1.8 for libgcj. > Tom> Thanks! > > I

Re: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch)

2004-01-15 Thread Thomas Fitzsimmons
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 16:39, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Tom" == Thomas Fitzsimmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [ suggestions ] > > Tom> Anyway, this patch brings us closer to using automake-1.8 for libgcj. > Tom> Thanks! > > I