aclocal recursion error

2008-01-07 Thread Skip Montanaro
on the problem? Is the AM_PATH_SMPEG definition indeed the culprit? It's definition is a big honking mess, otherwise I'd just post it here (gmane would no doubt complain about line length). Instead, I tossed it on the web: http://www.webfast.com/~skip/smpeg.m4 Any help appreciated. Thanks, Skip Montanaro

Re: aclocal recursion error

2008-01-07 Thread Skip Montanaro
H_BOTTOM([#endif /* pull_config_h_included */]) AM_CONFIG_HEADER(config.h) AC_CONFIG_FILES([ Makefile ]) AC_OUTPUT I think everything in the configure.ac file is pretty generic. Thx, Skip Montanaro

Re: aclocal recursion error

2008-01-07 Thread Skip Montanaro
h -I to the > installed location of the respective libtool.m4. Thanks. I am kind of trying to stick with MacPorts provides. I'll check to see if anything can be updated though. Skip Montanaro

Re: aclocal recursion error

2008-01-07 Thread Skip Montanaro
.. Now I'm a little confused. Seeing those version numbers over the weekend I thought I would need 1.9f, it being a higher number than 1.5. I will try switching back to the 1.5.24 version. In your opinion should the MacPorts folks even be advertising 1.9f in such a way that would lead naiv

Re: aclocal recursion error

2008-01-07 Thread Skip Montanaro
> Took another look at what's available in MacPorts. I see two things > matching my search for libtool: > > libtool devel/libtool 1.5.24 GNU Libtool ... > libtool-devel devel/libtool-devel 1.9f The GNU Portable ... Woo hoo! Deactivating libtool-devel and activating

automake reports .lo file created with and without libtool

2002-04-10 Thread Skip Montanaro
m, or if it's a problem at all. I didn't encounter any errors during the subsequent configure and make steps or when running a simple test program. Thanks, -- Skip Montanaro ([EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.mojam.com/)

Re: automake reports .lo file created with and without libtool

2002-04-10 Thread Skip Montanaro
Skip> lib_LIBRARIES = libalf.a Skip> libalf_a_SOURCES = alf.c alf.h common.h Skip> lib_LTLIBRARIES = libalf.la Skip> libalf_la_SOURCES = alf.c alf.h common.h Tom> In this particular case can't you just rely on libtool to create Tom> the static library for you? I don't kn

Re: automake reports .lo file created with and without libtool

2002-04-10 Thread Skip Montanaro
src/Makefile.am and put up with the warning message from automake. Any suggestions about alternative approaches would be gladly received. -- Skip Montanaro ([EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.mojam.com/)

building/installing Python modules?

2002-04-22 Thread Skip Montanaro
odule, not a package. Thanks, -- Skip Montanaro ([EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.mojam.com/)

Re: building/installing Python modules?

2002-04-24 Thread Skip Montanaro
, automake, libtool trio) seems pretty dang opaque to me at this point. I haven't figured out how to use what's there, let alone make changes to it. -- Skip Montanaro ([EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.mojam.com/)

Re: building/installing Python modules?

2002-04-25 Thread Skip Montanaro
python setup.py build install : build python setup.py install No big deal at the moment because I am working on a small library which contains a single extension module. The "rm -rf" trick would be impractical for a large library though. -- Skip Montanaro ([EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.mojam.com/)

What's this aclocal error mean?

2002-04-25 Thread Skip Montanaro
dnl check if the headers exist: save_CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS" CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS $PYTHON_INCLUDES" AC_TRY_CPP([#include ],dnl [AC_MSG_RESULT($PYTHON_INCLUDES) $1],dnl [AC_MSG_RESULT(no) $2]) CPPFLAGS="$save_CPPFLAGS" ]) Why is aclocal upset? Thx, -- Skip Montanaro ([EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.mojam.com/)

Re: building/installing Python modules?

2002-04-26 Thread Skip Montanaro
skip> ... and then diddle some bits in arraymodule.c, neither skip> .../arraymodule.o nor /array.so get rebuilt the next time I skip> run make. christoph> On my system (linux 2.4, python 2.1.1), the dependency stuff christoph> works well. In fact in the above situation, o

autom4te.cache?

2002-04-29 Thread Skip Montanaro
his is handled by a newer version? -- Skip Montanaro ([EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.mojam.com/)

can't get away from automake on remote machine

2002-04-30 Thread Skip Montanaro
? stamp-h1 ? python/Makefile ? src/Makefile ? src/.deps ? test/Makefile ? test/.deps None of them should be checked into CVS, should they? Thx, -- Skip Montanaro ([EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.mojam.com/)

Re: can't get away from automake on remote machine

2002-04-30 Thread Skip Montanaro
ion. "make dist" would work fine for actual distributions, but not if they need CVS access. -- Skip Montanaro ([EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.mojam.com/)

Re: can't get away from automake on remote machine

2002-04-30 Thread Skip Montanaro
o stop these appearing. Thanks, but that wasn't quite what I was asking. I was concerned that one or more of those unknown files actually should have been checked into CVS to cure the problems I was having. Alexandre's response about file timestamps cleared up the problem (at least in my head - I still need to implement something). -- Skip Montanaro ([EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.mojam.com/)

Re: building/installing Python modules?

2002-05-02 Thread Skip Montanaro
on extensions. The solution was to write a python importer for >> libtool .la files. Would you be willing to share your auto*/libtool/python mods with the intention of getting this capability added to the relevant distributions? Thx, -- Skip Montanaro ([EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.mojam.com/)

Re: spam

2002-05-14 Thread Skip Montanaro
hristoph> full time administrator is needed, in fact it would be easy christoph> to implement. After the flood I sent a note to the appropriate parties as was recommended, but received no response. Does anyone know if the list parameters were changed? -- Skip Montanaro ([EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: spam

2002-05-16 Thread Skip Montanaro
7;t know if Mailman 2.1 allows nonsubscriber posts to be rejected without human intervention or not. Since the FSF folks seem to want to manage all the @gnu.org lists themselves, perhaps they felt having their admin(s) have to wade through all that crap was too big a burden. -- Skip Montan