Hi,
I know there are other threads on this topic already, but they don't
seem to match my situation exactly, so I hope people don't mind a bit
of a repeat.
My top-level directory contains source for several libraries and a
binary. One of the libraries depends on the other, but so too do the
bina
I'm trying to get a binary to compile only if a certain "--enable-xxx" is
specified to ./configure. There may be a filename collision that's causing
problems. Maybe someone here can check my math.
Near the top of Makefile.am, I start with:
sbin_PROGRAMS = openfoo openfoo-util1 openfoo-util2
What is the general wisdom when deciding whether to add support for a new
"-with" vs. just encouraging use of CFLAGS/LDFLAGS on the command line?
In particular I'm talking about openssl here. I have a package that needs it.
Several systems come stock with an older version in /usr and then peop
> -Original Message-
> From: automake-bounces+msk=cloudmark@gnu.org [mailto:automake-
> bounces+msk=cloudmark@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Murray S. Kucherawy
> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 1:31 PM
> To: Automake@gnu.org
> Subject: CFLAGS/LDFLAGS vs. --with
>
I've got a package that first builds a library and then a binary that links to
the library. The binary build references it via:
progname_LIBADD = ../libdirectory/libraryname.la
A previous version of the library was installed in /usr/local/lib. Some other
things autoconf discovers causes -L/us
rence
>
> On 1/25/10 2:25 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> > I've got a package that first builds a library and then a binary that
> links to the library. The binary build references it via:
> >
> > progname_LIBADD = ../libdirectory/libraryname.la
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Friesenhahn [mailto:bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us]
> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 10:37 AM
> To: Murray S. Kucherawy
> Cc: Peter Johansson; automake@gnu.org
> Subject: RE: libtool issue in a Makefile.am reference
>
> > Anything
