So I took a closer look at the whitelisting problem that was reported
in GNU Smalltalk.
The piece of code that was removed in Automake-NG is:
foreach my $primary ('SOURCES', 'LIBADD', 'LDADD', 'LDFLAGS', 'DEPENDENCIES')
{
foreach my $var (variables $primary)
{
my $va
On 08/21/2012 07:14 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 08/21/2012 06:01 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>> * Alternatively, could Automake-NG suggest converting suffix
>> rules to pattern rules
>>
> Yep, I will amend NG-NEWS to suggest that.
>
Done with the patch below. I will push shortly.
8<---
On 08/21/2012 06:03 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>> Looking at GNU Smalltalk, I see:
>>
>> * warn for INCLUDES (vs. AM_CPPFLAGS)
>>
Turns out this has already been done for ages (at least since 2003).
I'll just remove support for it in Automake 1.13. See the patch
below.
OK?
Regards,
Stefano
--
On 08/15/2012 04:46 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 15/08/2012 12:49, Del Merritt wrote:
All good questions; mostly because I am not completely sure yet that a)
I won't want to be able to install the sub-libraries later, b) my
hand-built makefiles do it this way already, so I was minimizing
cha
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Stefano Lattarini
wrote:
> On 08/21/2012 06:03 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>> Looking at GNU Smalltalk, I see:
>>>
>>> * warn for INCLUDES (vs. AM_CPPFLAGS)
>>>
> Turns out this has already been done for ages (at least since 2003).
> I'll just remove support for i
On 22/08/2012 12:12, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> What about first making the warning visible always, not just with
> -Wobsolete? And add to the message that support will be removed in
> 1.14.
+1
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Stefano Lattarini
> wrote:
>> On 08/21/2012 06:03 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
Looking at GNU Smalltalk, I see:
* warn for INCLUDES (vs. AM_CPPFLAGS)
>> Turns out this has already been do
On 08/22/2012 09:12 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>From 54a49542d417850e646fefe7bad56546a2362449 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Message-Id:
> <54a49542d417850e646fefe7bad56546a2362449.1345648257.git.stefano.lattar...@gmail.com>
> From: Stefano Lattarini
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:40:15 +0200
> Subje
On 08/22/2012 10:28 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 08/22/2012 09:12 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> >From 54a49542d417850e646fefe7bad56546a2362449 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> Message-Id:
>> <54a49542d417850e646fefe7bad56546a2362449.1345648257.git.stefano.lattar...@gmail.com>
>> From: Stefano Lattarini
Il 22/08/2012 23:52, Stefano Lattarini ha scritto:
>> > I'd much rather a mandatory noisy warning period before a feature is
>> > completely removed.
>> >
> This would require a new category of warnings that are are unconditionally
> show, regardless of strictness or any "-Wnone" option. As usual,
On 08/22/2012 03:52 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> OTOH, I believe developers working on older systems should be ready to
> install more recent developer tools once in a while. You can't truly
> expect not to update your Automake installation for 3, 4 years!
Oh, _I_ fully wish that RHEL 5 would
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Del Merritt wrote:
[Reponding on-list to what was Diego's private response to me; I hope he
doesn't mind.]
I just finished an experiment with a single libfoo.a and all many-thousands
of sources for libfoo_a_SOURCES. The compilation worked, but I got the
dreaded "make[1
12 matches
Mail list logo
