distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time

2012-08-06 Thread Peter Johansson
Hi, I'd like to distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12 (or later) at autoconf time. I wonder is there's any documented macro that was introduced in 1.12 that I could use to m4_ifdef? Cheers, Peter

Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time

2012-08-06 Thread Eric Blake
On 08/06/2012 05:29 PM, Peter Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12 (or later) at autoconf > time. I wonder is there's any documented macro that was introduced in > 1.12 that I could use to m4_ifdef? If nothing else, the autoconf philosophy of feature checks b

Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time

2012-08-06 Thread Peter Johansson
Hi Eric, On 08/07/2012 09:36 AM, Eric Blake wrote: On 08/06/2012 05:29 PM, Peter Johansson wrote: Hi, I'd like to distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12 (or later) at autoconf time. I wonder is there's any documented macro that was introduced in 1.12 that I could use to m4_ifdef? If nothing else

Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time

2012-08-06 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 08/07/2012 01:36 AM, Eric Blake wrote: On 08/06/2012 05:29 PM, Peter Johansson wrote: Hi, I'd like to distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12 (or later) at autoconf time. I wonder is there's any documented macro that was introduced in 1.12 that I could use to m4_ifdef? If nothing else, the aut

Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time

2012-08-06 Thread Miles Bader
Ralf Corsepius writes: > My issue is <...rantrantblatherblather...> Please start a new thread when your message has bugger all to do with the previous message. Thanks, -miles -- The car has become... an article of dress without which we feel uncertain, unclad, and incomplete. [Marshall McLuh

Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time

2012-08-06 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 08/07/2012 08:16 AM, Miles Bader wrote: Ralf Corsepius writes: My issue is <...rantrantblatherblather...> Please start a new thread when your message has bugger all to do with the previous message. Pardon, may-be I am missing something, but in my understanding I am having the same issue a

Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time

2012-08-06 Thread Miles Bader
Ralf Corsepius writes: > Pardon, may-be I am missing something, but in my understanding I am > having the same issue as the OP: No, you were just looking for an excuse to start ranting... -miles -- "Yorton, Wressle, and Gospel Oak, the richness of your heritage is ended. We shall not stop at y

Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time

2012-08-06 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 08/07/2012 08:35 AM, Miles Bader wrote: Ralf Corsepius writes: Pardon, may-be I am missing something, but in my understanding I am having the same issue as the OP: No, you were just looking for an excuse to start ranting... Feel free to think so ... EOT