On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> Pippijn wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 05:26:58PM -0700, Harlan Stenn wrote:
>> > If there was a student interested in showing how "easy" it was to use
>> > automake to do non-recursive Makefiles for a project, I'd be willing to
>> > co-m
According to the Fedora Packaging:Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
.la files should not be installed:
> Packaging Static Libraries
>
> Packages including libraries should exclude static libs as far as possible
> (eg by configuring with --disable-static). Static librar
On 2011-03-21 10:52 -0500, Paul Elliott wrote:
> According to the Fedora Packaging:Guidelines
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
>
> .la files should not be installed:
This is a task for the Fedora packagers, and not for developers to bake
into their makefiles. See below.
> Ho
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 17:52, Paul Elliott
wrote:
> According to the Fedora Packaging:Guidelines
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
>
> .la files should not be installed:
>> Packaging Static Libraries
>>
>> Packages including libraries should exclude static libs as far as possib
On 03/21/2011 10:52 AM, Paul Elliott wrote:
According to the Fedora Packaging:Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
.la files should not be installed:
Packaging Static Libraries
How do I create a Makefile.am for a shared library so that make install will
not install
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:49:39AM -0400, NightStrike wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> > Pippijn wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 05:26:58PM -0700, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> >> > If there was a student interested in showing how "easy" it was to use
> >> > automake
On 2011-03-19 12:07 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Maybe such a proposal could be enhanced to avoid having not enough work:
[...]
> This way the student will not get bored. However, it might be harder
> to define specific goals to achieve, or to define success in the end.
I have two suggestions
On Monday, March 21, 2011 12:51:11 pm Nick Bowler wrote:
> On 2011-03-21 10:52 -0500, Paul Elliott wrote:
> > According to the Fedora Packaging:Guidelines
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
>
> > .la files should not be installed:
> This is a task for the Fedora packagers, and
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Can't automake rewrite the relative paths to be absolute?
This would break things, for example when using WINE via wrapper
scripts, require fixed srcdir pathes...
oki,
Steffen
On 2011-03-21 14:13 -0500, Paul Elliott wrote:
> On Monday, March 21, 2011 12:51:11 pm Nick Bowler wrote:
> > Since Fedora has complete control over how packages are configured
> > and installed, they can afford to make the necessary arrangements
> > rendering the .la files unnecessary.
[...]
> Wel
Summarizing a long discussion:
>
> ABSTRACT:
>
> The Test Anything Protocol (TAP) is a simple text-based protocol
> that allows communication between test scripts and a test harness.
>
> [HUGE CUT]
>
Hello all, and especially hello Robert (yes, I'm shamelessly asking
for your partecipation he
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 21:13, Paul Elliott
wrote:
> On Monday, March 21, 2011 12:51:11 pm Nick Bowler wrote:
>> On 2011-03-21 10:52 -0500, Paul Elliott wrote:
>> > According to the Fedora Packaging:Guidelines
>> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
>>
>> > .la files should not be
On Monday, March 21, 2011 02:13:24 pm Paul Elliott wrote:
> It seems dumb to have make install install a file only to have the distro
> remove it, is there anyway to tell make install not to install it?
I guess I should not do it that way because somebody might want to use the
auto*tools setup
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Stefano Lattarini
> to its suboptimal documentation. So I'm going to ask: Robert, as
> the main proposer/supporter of the SubUnit protocol here, would you
> be willing and ready to help me out during my prospective work with
> GSoC, if I update my application's goa
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 10:48 +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Stefano Lattarini
> > to its suboptimal documentation. So I'm going to ask: Robert, as
> > the main proposer/supporter of the SubUnit protocol here, would you
> > be willing and ready to help me out during
I have a c library that currently uses an old style Makefile that I want to
convert to auto*tools.
One .c file is used as a .h file. That is, it is included by another .c file
and
it should not be itself compiled. Why the author did this I do not know, but I
do not want to change the author's
16 matches
Mail list logo
