"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote on 2010/01/29 17:47:40:
>
>> I was refering to AM_SILENT_RULES, which supresses `make all'
>> output; so this is not a very controversial topic, it is already
>> in automake and used by several projects. Would you like to work
>> on this feature? The main
Peter Johansson wrote on 2010/01/29 18:00:33:
>
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Is there a reason why the install target doesn't respect make -s?
> >
> >
> Wow. Pointless trying to add anything to discussion whether things are
> good or evil.
>
> But note this comment in depend2.am:
>
> ## Verbosity
Ralf Wildenhues wrote on 2010/01/30 00:34:17:
>
> Hello,
>
> * Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 09:05:07AM CET:
> >
> > Is there a reason why the install target doesn't respect make -s?
> >
> > I would really like to see autotools and libtool respect make -s.
> > When a developer ask
Hello Ralf,
On 01/28/2010 09:22 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Daniel,
* Daniel Pocock wrote on Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 03:21:24PM CET:
We have been working on getting the Ganglia tarball to work out of
the box for AIX
When Michael does `make install', the *.so files for our m
Hi Daniel,
On 01/29/2010 12:19 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Daniel,
* Daniel Pocock wrote on Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 03:21:24PM CET:
We have been working on getting the Ganglia tarball to work out of
the box for AIX
When Michael does `make install', the *.so files for
Hi Daniel,
On 01/29/2010 11:46 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Daniel Pocock wrote:
I've looked at the manual for -brtl and it tells me that the flag is
needed for building targets that depend on other shared objects.
The gmond executable itself loads various other modules (shared
objects) using d
> > The documented automake behavior states that automake chooses the
> > linker based on a static list of source files. This is not
> > sufficient. I'm hoping I've missed a detail somewhere, but my
> > experience backs up the documented claims. I've tried using
> > AM_CONDITIONALs like so:
> >
Hello Michael,
* Michael Perzl wrote on Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 07:46:57PM CET:
> That is without the "-Wl,-brtl" passed to LDFLAGS, so libtool is
> behaving correctly on AIX to put the modcpu.so into the modcpu.a
> library archive.
>
> The "misbehavior" is that the "*.a" containing the "*.so" files
Hello,
let me address one part of the issue here (for the moment let's
ignore the separate libtool --mode=install verbosity issue):
* Alfred M. Szmidt wrote on Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 05:47:40PM CET:
> You don't need that much programming skills to fix this, infact, all
> the scaffolding is in place
* Joakim Tjernlund wrote on Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 02:57:40PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote on 2010/01/30 00:34:17:
> > First off, `make -s' is both POSIX and portable. Conceptually, `make
> > -s' has nothing to do with the `silent-rules' option that recent
>
> Exactly, and I am asking for autotools
10 matches
Mail list logo