Re: silent-rules

2009-10-13 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote: The problem is verifying "correctness of building" packages in batches. i.e. to monitor/inspect CFLAGS, CPPFLAGS, LDFLAGS etc. in compiler calls etc. for correctness (NB: A package, which compiles without warning doesn't mean it is being built corr

Re: silent-rules

2009-10-13 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 10/13/2009 04:49 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote: The problem is verifying "correctness of building" packages in batches. i.e. to monitor/inspect CFLAGS, CPPFLAGS, LDFLAGS etc. in compiler calls etc. for correctness (NB: A package, which compiles with

Only compiling objects, without creating a library

2009-10-13 Thread Martin Kalbfuß
Hi, I want to create a library for the GNU-Modula compiler. But the libraries are pure object files in a separate directory. Some kind of package. Is there a target for this? Thanks

Re: silent-rules

2009-10-13 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Ralf Corsepius on 10/13/2009 9:20 AM: What work does it cause except for using --disable-silent-rules at configure time or V=1 at make time? >>> Exactly this is the problem. >> >> The problem isn't the support for silent rules.

Re: silent-rules

2009-10-13 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 10/14/2009 02:58 AM, Eric Blake wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Ralf Corsepius on 10/13/2009 9:20 AM: What work does it cause except for using --disable-silent-rules at configure time or V=1 at make time? Exactly this is the problem. The problem isn't the

Re: Difficulty cross-compiling

2009-10-13 Thread Harlan Stenn
William, I did a lot of what you are talking about when I was there - do you have access to any of the ATC stuff? H

RE: Difficulty cross-compiling

2009-10-13 Thread William Tracy (wtracy)
Probably not, but I could poke around and see. I suspect I ultimately need to grab someone from our build team and get them to escalate this to MontaVista; I thought I'd try on a few mailers first and see if I might get a response without going through multiple layers of indirection. :-P Ralph: M

Re: Only compiling objects, without creating a library

2009-10-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Martin, * Martin Kalbfuß wrote on Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:21:13PM CEST: > I want to create a library for the GNU-Modula compiler. But the > libraries are pure object files in a separate directory. Some kind of > package. > > Is there a target for this? No. But if you write the compile rul

Re: silent-rules

2009-10-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ dropping autoconf@ ] * Ralf Corsepius wrote on Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 05:20:30PM CEST: > On 10/13/2009 04:49 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > >On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> > >>The problem is verifying "correctness of building" packages in batches. > >> > >>i.e. to monitor/inspect CF

(no subject)

2009-10-13 Thread Vincent Torri
Hey, in a subdirectory, we generate a file. First we want to delete it, then fill it with >>. So we use that rule: $(builddir)/eina_amalgamation.c: $(sources_used) Makefile -rm -f $(builddir)/eina_amalgamation.c (it is followed by the creation of the file) With automake 1.10 or 1.11

Re: (no subject)

2009-10-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Vincent Torri wrote on Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 07:48:35AM CEST: > $(builddir)/eina_amalgamation.c: $(sources_used) Makefile > -rm -f $(builddir)/eina_amalgamation.c $(builddir) is always equal to '.'; also, non-GNU makes don't identify FILE and ./FILE; so you are better off omitting '$(buildd

$(builddir) is empty with automake <= 1.9

2009-10-13 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Vincent Torri wrote on Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 07:48:35AM CEST: $(builddir)/eina_amalgamation.c: $(sources_used) Makefile -rm -f $(builddir)/eina_amalgamation.c $(builddir) is always equal to '.'; also, non-GNU makes don't identify FILE and