Re: Setting shared lib version not functioning

2009-05-06 Thread Andreas Schwab
John Calcote writes: > One thing that bothers me a little is that we never really did solve > Gerald's original problem. He said his library was created just fine when > he was passing 2:0:0, but when he switched to 2:0:1, it created a library > with a version number of 1:1:0. Now, why would Libt

Extra make rules

2009-05-06 Thread Philip Herron
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey This is probably in the automake manual but hey. I am wondering is it possible to say in a Makefile.am besides your bin_programs CFLAGS etc... Can you add extra things like a: make check rule -> to run the bin_program(s) and grep for a certain ou

Re: Setting shared lib version not functioning

2009-05-06 Thread John Calcote
On 5/6/2009 3:15 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: John Calcote writes: One thing that bothers me a little is that we never really did solve Gerald's original problem. He said his library was created just fine when he was passing 2:0:0, but when he switched to 2:0:1, it created a library with a ve

Re: Extra make rules

2009-05-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Philip, * Philip Herron wrote on Wed, May 06, 2009 at 03:49:50PM CEST: > > This is probably in the automake manual but hey. I am wondering is it > possible to say in a Makefile.am besides your bin_programs CFLAGS etc... > > Can you add extra things like a: make check rule -> to run the > b

Re: Setting shared lib version not functioning

2009-05-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi John, * John Calcote wrote on Wed, May 06, 2009 at 02:18:10AM CEST: > When I said "ridiculous cases" I really meant "bogus triplets". I didn't > think there was much you could do about valid triplets that are simply > incorrect. I should think that Libtool might fail a build if a bogus >

Re: Setting shared lib version not functioning

2009-05-06 Thread Gerald I. Evenden
As and aside on this whole mess and before I blow my brains out (just kidding, I think) I tried starting the whole mess over and setting the version to 0:0:0 after doing a 'make maintainer-clean'. Well, everything compiled and looked OK when installed in /usr/local/lib libproject.a libproject.l

Re: Setting shared lib version not functioning

2009-05-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Gerald, * Gerald I. Evenden wrote on Thu, May 07, 2009 at 02:58:28AM CEST: > Well, everything compiled and looked OK when installed in /usr/local/lib > > libproject.a > libproject.la > libproject.so > libproject.so.0 > libproject.so.0.0.0 > > BUT!! Now when I try to recompile any applicati