Re: Dependency question with _LDADD

Olly Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:39:36 + (UTC) >On 2008-08-27, Michel Briand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Last, but not the least: autotools documentation that can be found on >> the web seems to obsoletes rapidly. There is the famous autobook that's >> not maintained any

Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD

Michel Briand wrote: :: src/lib/Makefile.am :: # Library: libtraining # Generates its own pkg-config definition file AM_CPPFLAGS = -DLIBRARY_VERSION=\"$(LIBRARY_VERSION)\" Why not put AC_DEFINE([LIBRARY_VERSION], ...) in configure.ac, so you don't need the abo

Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD

Hi Braden, * Braden McDaniel wrote on Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 08:48:45AM CEST: > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 07:41 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Michel Briand wrote on Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 03:19:24AM CEST: > > > Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:43:13 +0200 > > > >Why '-I conf

Re: [automake] Dependency question with _LDADD

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Braden, * Braden McDaniel wrote on Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 08:48:45AM CEST: On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 07:41 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Michel Briand wrote on Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 03:19:24AM CEST: Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:43:13 +0200 Wh