* NightStrike wrote on Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:14:22PM CEST:
>
> Should static libraries be executable?
They need not be. But it's no problem if they are.
Cheers,
Ralf
Why worry about which library files should be executable and which ones
are not?
Would it be easier to use:
foodir=/where/ever
foo_LIBRARIES = ...
and let the generated Makefile handle getting the permissions right?
H
On 10/19/07, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | # These targets require special handling that automake can't
> | # yet support (or that I don't know how to do properly)
> | crtdir=$(prefix)/$(target)/lib
> | crt_SCRIPTS = \
> | crt1.o crt2.
>
> There is nothing inherently wrong with d
NightStrike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok. I just tested your idea, and I am going to move all .a custom
> targets to a _DATA primary, and leave the _SCRIPTS primary for just
> the custom executable targets (like crt1.o, etc).
crt1.o is DATA as well.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs,
On 10/19/07, Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NightStrike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ok. I just tested your idea, and I am going to move all .a custom
> > targets to a _DATA primary, and leave the _SCRIPTS primary for just
> > the custom executable targets (like crt1.o, etc).
>
>
On Oct 19, 2007, at 7:16 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Benoit,
* Benoit SIGOURE wrote on Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 06:48:25PM CEST:
# Add boost libraries.
AM_CXXFLAGS += $(BOOST_CPPFLAGS)
AM_LDFLAGS += $(BOOST_LDFLAGS) $(BOOST_THREAD_LIB)
Don't put libs (-l...) in LDFLAGS, it messes up the o
On 10/19/07, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * NightStrike wrote on Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:14:22PM CEST:
> >
> > Should static libraries be executable?
>
> They need not be. But it's no problem if they are.
Ok. I just tested your idea, and I am going to move all .a custom
targets t
On 10/19/07, Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why worry about which library files should be executable and which ones
> are not?
>
> Would it be easier to use:
>
> foodir=/where/ever
> foo_LIBRARIES = ...
>
> and let the generated Makefile handle getting the permissions right?
For 8 or
Hello Benoit,
* Benoit SIGOURE wrote on Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 06:48:25PM CEST:
>
> # Add boost libraries.
> AM_CXXFLAGS += $(BOOST_CPPFLAGS)
> AM_LDFLAGS += $(BOOST_LDFLAGS) $(BOOST_THREAD_LIB)
Don't put libs (-l...) in LDFLAGS, it messes up the ordering. Put them
in *_LDADD/*_LIBADD or LIBS.
ping..
On 10/16/07, NightStrike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to build a Makefile.am file "correctly". This is what I
> have so far:
>
> http://mingw-w64.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/mingw-w64/experimental/buildsystem/Makefile.am?revision=137&view=markup
>
> Some issues that I've noted i
Hello list,
[CC: Akim: that's why trunk doesn't compile on Windows/MinGW]
In a project where we use both Automake and Libtool, I have a program
named `uconsole' which depends on Boost and a libtool library
`libkernel.a' built in the same directory (which also depends on Boost).
Here is an e
* NightStrike wrote on Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:42:55PM CEST:
> I am trying to build a Makefile.am file "correctly". This is what I
> have so far:
>
> http://mingw-w64.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/mingw-w64/experimental/buildsystem/Makefile.am?revision=137&view=markup
>
> Some issues that I've note
12 matches
Mail list logo
