Re: Automatic dependecy based compilation targets

On Wednesday 31 January 2007 19:38, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Dizzy wrote on Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 12:44:39PM CET: > Learn about EXTRA_noinst_LIBRARIES and other EXTRA_* thingies. Thank you very much I have done most of what I wanted with EXTRA_LTLIBRARIES (there is no EXTRA_noinst_LIBRARIES). No

automake 1.9.6 build failure

I am maintaining my copy of automake in a subversion vendor branch. I have encountered a problem that is very difficult for me to diagnose. The copy in subversion will not build on Solaris. The tarball will. And there seems to be no discernible difference between the two versions with respect to f

generated headers

I have some headers that are generated from other files. I don't what these headers installed nor included in the dist. I do need them for the compilation of some object files, though. If I attempt to add explicit dependencies such as: MeshTSTT.lo: $(TSTT_HDRS) then automake will not generate

Re: generated headers

Hello Jason, * Jason Kraftcheck wrote on Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 06:10:04PM CET: > I have some headers that are generated from other files. I don't what > these headers installed nor included in the dist. I do need them for the > compilation of some object files, though. That's what BUILT_SOURCES

Re: automake 1.9.6 build failure

Hello Mike, * Mike Owens wrote on Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:20:29PM CET: > I am maintaining my copy of automake in a subversion vendor branch. I > have encountered a problem that is very difficult for me to diagnose. > The copy in subversion will not build on Solaris. The tarball will. That's proba

Re: Automatic dependecy based compilation targets

Hello Mihai, * Dizzy wrote on Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:22:44PM CET: > > I get multiple definitions errors at link time for libfinal.la and symbols in > libbar.la. Now I can workarround this by "knowing" that libbar.la "provides" > libfoo.la (as LIBADD) and I shouldn't list libfoo.la too in libfi

Re: automake 1.9.6 build failure

Thanks for your reply. I bet you are correct, but there is still a problem: there is no bootstrap file in the project (tarball or svn). Where can I get a copy of this file? In the interim. I will search through older versions to see of there is a copy there to be had. -- Mike On 2/1/07, Ralf Wil

Re: automake 1.9.6 build failure

That did it. I downloaded a copy of bootstrap from CVS and ran it. Everything worked fine after that. Thanks for your help. -- Mike On 2/1/07, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Mike, * Mike Owens wrote on Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:20:29PM CET: > I am maintaining my copy of automak

Re: automake 1.9.6 build failure

* Mike Owens wrote on Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 08:35:37PM CET: > Thanks for your reply. I bet you are correct, but there is still a > problem: there is no bootstrap file in the project (tarball or svn). It's in the upstream CVS source tree: