Hello Russ,
* Russ Allbery wrote on Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 07:19:10PM CEST:
> A while back, I asked about Automake support for AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR in
> the context of using Automake to support a non-recursive build of a
> package. The result of the discussion was that Automake required some
> func
On 8/8/06, David Everly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While I was writing this email I received this one from HP:
"Well, I got a response from the lab, but not the one I was hoping for.
They took your test suite and said that they can dup the problem with
A.06.06, but when they tested with the la
>>> "BP" == Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BP> I did a quick job of proofreading as I read your chapter.
(And so did Ralf.)
Thanks a lot to both of you !
I'll post the complete patch momently on automake-patches.
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Shared books are happy books. http://www.boo
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RW> IOW, are you asking when 1.10 will be ready?
I hope I can release a beta for 1.10 this weekend.
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Shared books are happy books. http://www.bookcrossing.com/friend/gadl
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:31:19PM CEST:
> >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> RW> IOW, are you asking when 1.10 will be ready?
>
> I hope I can release a beta for 1.10 this weekend.
I would like to try to get some of my lingering Fortran wor
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Russ Allbery wrote on Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 07:19:10PM CEST:
>> A while back, I asked about Automake support for AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR
>> in the context of using Automake to support a non-recursive build of a
>> package. The result of the discussion w
