Re: Non-recursive makefiles

2006-06-06 Thread Marc Alff
Hi all, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Mon, 29 May 2006, Stefan Puiu wrote: >> However, people haven't mentioned yet the main point in Peter Miller's >> paper - dependency handling, which I think is very important (I would >> say significantly more important than the ability to type "make clean" >>

Re: GNU Autoconf test version 2.59d available

2006-06-06 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 08:29 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Ralf, > > * Ralf Corsepius wrote on Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 05:44:00AM CEST: > > On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 23:15 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > GNU Autoconf test version 2.59d is now available. > > > > > > This is a beta release, intend

Re: GNU Autoconf test version 2.59d available

2006-06-06 Thread Paul Eggert
Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > => If automake doesn't hold what it promises, it's a bug in automake At the very least there is a documentation problem in Automake, because nowhere does it say that you can't have a test named 'test' -- a situation that caused coreutils 'make check' t

Re: GNU Autoconf test version 2.59d available

2006-06-06 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 02:22 -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > => If automake doesn't hold what it promises, it's a bug in automake > > At the very least there is a documentation problem in Automake, > because nowhere does it say that you can't have a tes

Re: GNU Autoconf test version 2.59d available

2006-06-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Ralf, * Ralf Corsepius wrote on Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 10:07:15AM CEST: > On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 08:29 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: We are seriously talking past each other. > > If you are using > > Automake, the changed directory variables (assuming you are referring to > > them) will be

Re: GNU Autoconf test version 2.59d available

2006-06-06 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello Paul and Ralves, the change discussed here was triggered by problems with Solaris' make. I agree that the Automake manual could mention this bad scenario, perhaps something like: ``Avoid files with names identical to shell builtins or basic commands; during a VPATH build, Solaris' @command{

Re: GNU Autoconf test version 2.59d available

2006-06-06 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 14:00 +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote: > Hello Paul and Ralves, > > the change discussed here was triggered by problems with Solaris' > make. > > I agree that the Automake manual could mention this bad scenario, > perhaps something like: > ``Avoid files with names identical to she

Re: GNU Autoconf test version 2.59d available

2006-06-06 Thread Paul Eggert
Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The sub-sentence I consider to be wrong is this: > > INSTALL now suggests VPATH builds (e.g., "sh ../srcdir/configure") > only if you use GNU make. This is merely a sentence taken from the NEWS file for Autoconf. It isn't a constraint on Autoconf'