Re: automake not working inspite of Makefile.am

2005-03-02 Thread David Mohr
Hi, On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:09:09 +0100, Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > [the right list for this question would be automake@gnu.org, btw] > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 04:31:13PM -0300, Hema K wrote: > > i have a problem even though i have Makefile.am > > i am getting the follo

Re: automake not working inspite of Makefile.am

2005-03-02 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hi, On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 10:30:13AM -0600, David Mohr wrote: > > I guess you don't have > > AC_CONFIG_FILES(Makefile.in) > > in your configure.{ac,in} > > AC_CONFIG_FILES(Makefile) of course, I apologize for the misleading typo. > couldn't find a definition for AC_CONFIG_FILES, The

Re: targets to handle gnu dist procedures?

2005-03-02 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Karl" == Karl Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Karl> John Darrington (cc'd here), who maintains the GNUbik package, made this Karl> suggestion: >> With the new ftp upload procedures, shouldn't the automake targets be >> changed appropriately? In particular: >> >> The dist target sho

Re: automake not working inspite of Makefile.am

2005-03-02 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "David" == David Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David> shouldn't that be AC_CONFIG_FILES(Makefile)? I recent Automake release would have to you that along with the initial diagnostic you posted. Consider upgrading. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: targets to handle gnu dist procedures?

2005-03-02 Thread Tom Howard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > Actually the release procedure is so different for each package > that it seems impossible to automatize. > > In the case of the Automake package, for instance, the release > procedure (after you have modified the ve