BONANZA!! BONANZA!!!

2004-09-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Treasure Chest Sweepstakes Lottery, Nachtwachtlaan 20, Amsterdam 1058 EA, Netherlands BONANZA ! BONANZA !! BONANZA !!! Hurray! You have been selected as one of the five lucky winners in the second edition of the TREASURE CHEST SWEEPSTAKES promotional draw. You have therefore been approved for

Re: compile problem

2004-09-20 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Gary> But for a project built with `make -j', we still need AM_PROG_CC_C_O Gary> and _LT_COMPILER_C_O to understand each others' locks :-( Seems so. I thought it was not needed because when AM_PROG_CC_C_O decides `compile' is required, i

Re: compile problem

2004-09-20 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Gary> I'm not saying that the compile script should be used, Gary> just that the tests to determine whether it might be Gary> needed are run as a matter of course. Looking at the Gary> implementation of AM_PROG_CC_C_O, I see that

Re: compile problem

2004-09-20 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Alexandre Duret-Lutz writes: "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Gary> But for a project built with `make -j', we still need AM_PROG_CC_C_O Gary> and _LT_COMPILER_C_O to understand each others' locks :-( Seems so. I thought it was not needed because when AM_PROG_CC_C_O decid