Title: The ChessBrain Network
T
o be removed from our mailing
list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Robert> It transforms macros and paths in an included file (called
Robert> Makefile.rules for now) , to make them suitable for a non-recursive
Robert> build.
I'm skeptical about whether this approach can be made to work
intuitiv
>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 20:00, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>> >>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Robert> Are the following tests known to fail (on debian unstable):
>>
>> Nein, no tests are known to
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 20:00, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> >>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Robert> Are the following tests known to fail (on debian unstable):
>
> Nein, no tests are known to fail. What does VERBOSE=x say?
that the scripts in lib/ aren't chmodded
On Sat, 2003-12-20 at 00:47, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> Robert> that the scripts in lib/ aren't chmodded correctly.
>
> Why aren't they? How did they loose their permissions?
Errm, that was my fault. An oversight in a cvs extracting tool, that I
wasn't aware of at the time.
> Robert> Perh
On Sat, 2003-12-20 at 00:41, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> >>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> Robert> It transforms macros and paths in an included file (called
> Robert> Makefile.rules for now) , to make them suitable for a non-recursive
> Robert> build.
