Little Pinks Getting Wet!

2002-08-02 Thread gary
Title: Picture 3 ULTRA-XXX FARMYARD ACTION! It's fucking gross! Live dirty chat with real cowgirls, Illustrated barnyard adventures .. and much more! Visit now! Before the farmers take back their animals!

testing with .so and other questions

2002-08-02 Thread Waldemar Rosenbach
Linux 2.4.18 GNU Make version 3.79.1 autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.52 automake (GNU automake) 1.6.3 I'm trying to make a shared library and to test it. The library to test is libFiniteStateMachine.so and is built in the $(top_builddir) I have to create a libTestAction.so library in the $(top_builddi

Re: Beginner: a simple question about shared libraries

2002-08-02 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Ladislav" == Ladislav Strojil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Ladislav> I tried installing 1.6.3 (removed 1.5 before that) Ladislav> but now autconf tells me: Ladislav> [lada@smrz libadmis]$ aclocal && autoconf && automake Ladislav> configure.in:6: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_

You Gotta See This !!

2002-08-02 Thread kathy
Title: fetishcash Hot Blowjobs ~ Double Penetration ~ Oral Cumshots Full Anal Penetration ~ Beautiful Women Live Sex Shows ~ Streaming Movies ~ Hidden Cameras Hot XXX Pictures ~ 1 XXX Videos  

Re: Beginner: a simple question about shared libraries

2002-08-02 Thread Ladislav Strojil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 02 August 2002 13:38, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > >>> "Ladislav" == Ladislav Strojil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > Ladislav> I tried installing 1.6.3 (removed 1.5 before that) > Ladislav> but now autconf tells me: > Ladislav

(¼ºÀα¤°í) ²¿¿Á º¸·¯¿À¼¼¿ä ¼ºÀοµÈ­°üÀÔ´Ï´Ù.--¹Ì¼º³âÀÚ ÀÔÀåºÒ°¡

2002-08-02 Thread ¹Ì¾Æ
Title: Untitled **. ¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä?**. »õ·Ó°Ô ź»ýÇÑ ¿µÈ­°üÀÔ´Ï´Ù. http://eropenti.ibcine.tv/ 1. ½Å¼±ÇÑ ¼ºÀÎÀ¯¸Ó/¿µÈ­¸¦ ¿øÇϽô ºÐ 2. À¯ÀÍÇÑ °ÔÀÓÀ¸·Î ½ºÆ®·¹½º¸¦ Ç®°í ½ÍÀº ºÐ 3. °¶·¯¸®/¼ºÀοëÇ°À» ¿øÇϽô ºÐÀº ¾Æ·¡¸¦ Ŭ¸¯ Http://eropenti.ibcine.tv/ À§ ¿µÈ­°ü¿¡¼­´Â ½ÉÀǸ¦ Åë°úÇÑ ¿µÈ­¸¸ »ó¿µÇÕ´Ï´Ù. 

Re: Beginner: a simple question about shared libraries

2002-08-02 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Ladislav" == Ladislav Strojil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Ladislav> I still get a lot of Ladislav> Makefile:723: warning: overriding commands for target `admisSK.o' Ladislav> Makefile:290: warning: ignoring old commands for target `admisSK.o' [...] Thanks. I can reproduce this,

Re: Beginner: a simple question about shared libraries

2002-08-02 Thread Ladislav Strojil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 02 August 2002 16:53, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > >>> "Ladislav" == Ladislav Strojil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > Ladislav> I still get a lot of > Ladislav> Makefile:723: warning: overriding commands for target > `admisSK.o'

Re: Beginner: a simple question about shared libraries

2002-08-02 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Ladislav" == Ladislav Strojil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >> Thanks. I can reproduce this, it's definitely a bug in >> Automake. It seems Automake outputs these rules twice because >> it has seen two differents C++ extensions (.cc and .cpp). I'll >> look into this. Actually I'

[±¤°í] 3¸í¸¸ ¸ð¿©µµ ..

2002-08-02 Thread HP119
Title: HP119 - ´ëÇѹα¹ ´ëÇ¥ ÇÚµåÆù Àü¹® ¼îÇθô ÇöÀç°¡ : 69,000¿ø ½Åû¼ö·® : 11°³ [PS-3000] Internet 019 ÅÚ½¼ ½ÃÁß°¡ 100,000¿ø 3°³ºÎÅÍ ÃÖÀú°¡ 69,000¿ø ÇöÀç°¡ : 69,000¿ø ½Åû¼ö·® : 8°³ [Nokia 8277] Internet 019 ³ëÅ°¾Æ ½ÃÁß°¡ 120,000¿ø 3°³ºÎÅ

Re: Pathalogical behavior with "more" AM_CONDITIONAL()s?

2002-08-02 Thread Harlan Stenn
I've done a bit more testing. The slowdown happens if I only modify 1 Makefile.am, and it seems to be related to using SUBDIRS inside an AM_CONDITIONAL. If I change the Makefile.am to use a non-SUBDIRS variable inside the conditional autmake zips right along. In fact, if I specify an as-yet non

top-level Makefile required?

2002-08-02 Thread Harlan Stenn
Is it a bug or a feature that when using automake+autoconf there Must be a top-level Makefile? I tried to write a test case for automake (debugging the AM_CONDITIONAL slowdown problem I'm seeing) and I wrote a top-level configure.ac that only specified the following outputs: AC_CONFIG_FILE(a/Ma

Re: top-level Makefile required?

2002-08-02 Thread Robert Collins
On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 09:55, Harlan Stenn wrote: > Is it a bug or a feature that when using automake+autoconf there Must be a > top-level Makefile? > > I tried to write a test case for automake (debugging the AM_CONDITIONAL > slowdown problem I'm seeing) and I wrote a top-level configure.ac that

Re: Pathalogical behavior with "more" AM_CONDITIONAL()s?

2002-08-02 Thread Robert Collins
On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 09:50, Harlan Stenn wrote: > I've done a bit more testing. > > The slowdown happens if I only modify 1 Makefile.am, and it seems to be > related to using SUBDIRS inside an AM_CONDITIONAL. > > If I change the Makefile.am to use a non-SUBDIRS variable inside the > conditional

Re: top-level Makefile required?

2002-08-02 Thread Harlan Stenn
Bug, I'd guess. Why does automake/autoconf assume it is "in charge" of the directory structure? H -- > On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 09:55, Harlan Stenn wrote: > > Is it a bug or a feature that when using automake+autoconf there Must be a > > top-level Makefile? > > > > I tried to write a test case for

Re: Pathalogical behavior with "more" AM_CONDITIONAL()s?

2002-08-02 Thread Harlan Stenn
I'll work on posting an example. We do not use @x@ to expand subdir lists; that forces too much info into configure.XX. We write either: if FOO SUBDIRS = a b c endif or if FOO X_DIRS = a b endif SUBDIRS = $(X_DIRS) d e Again, I'm not sure why automake cares about SUBDIRS. From the .texi:

Re: top-level Makefile required?

2002-08-02 Thread Robert Collins
On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 10:02, Harlan Stenn wrote: > Bug, I'd guess. > > Why does automake/autoconf assume it is "in charge" of the directory > structure? I'll leave this to the core guys to answer. My understanding is that thats what automake is designed to handle though.. Rob

Re: top-level Makefile required?

2002-08-02 Thread Harlan Stenn
(Robert, thanks for your responses and attention!) I understand, and yet the .texi also says: Note that the directories listed in @code{SUBDIRS} are not required to contain @file{Makefile.am}s; only @file{Makefile}s (after configuration). This allows inclusion of libraries from packages which

Huysuz.com (Erotik)

2002-08-02 Thread huysuzseks
Title: Huysuz.com - Türkiye'nin En Kaliteli, En Farklý Ve En Geniþ Porno Arþivi!! Internet üzerindeki en vahþi, en sýcak ve en ahlaksýz türk sex sitesine girmek için hazýr mýsýnýz ? Tamamýyla Bedava!! 10'larca türk yapýmý porno film 250,000

[±¤°í] 3¸í¸¸ ¸ð¿©µµ ..

2002-08-02 Thread HP119
Title: HP119 - ´ëÇѹα¹ ´ëÇ¥ ÇÚµåÆù Àü¹® ¼îÇθô ÇöÀç°¡ : 69,000¿ø ½Åû¼ö·® : 11°³ [PS-3000] Internet 019 ÅÚ½¼ ½ÃÁß°¡ 100,000¿ø 3°³ºÎÅÍ ÃÖÀú°¡ 69,000¿ø ÇöÀç°¡ : 69,000¿ø ½Åû¼ö·® : 8°³ [Nokia 8277] Internet 019 ³ëÅ°¾Æ ½ÃÁß°¡ 120,000¿ø 3°³ºÎÅ

Place a Banner For Free and Make Money!

2002-08-02 Thread Greetings
Hello, How would you like to make more money from your website with NO INVESTMENT NECESSARY? How would you like to be able to offer an Internet Service Provider to your web site viewers for $14.95 or LESS per month? Now you can do both! You will simply need to get an ID number for free and co

(no subject)

2002-08-02 Thread John
WHOLESALE SOURCES 2002 FIND OVER 1,000,000 PRODUCTS The most useful Wholesale Source Guide ever put together... Save up to 90% on over ONE MILLION top quality brand-name products. Get low wholesale prices directly from Wholesalers, Distributors, Vendors, and Liquidators. Eliminate the middl

Tool to Promote Your Business

2002-08-02 Thread Greetings
You Will Receive fully functional Software Programs with unlock code just for signing in at my site. This software was developed by a business associate of mine. I have used it and it truly is of great quality. Go to http://tcenterprises3.50megs.com After you sign-in, you will receive a me