ÇëÄú½«ÎÒµÄE-mailµØÖ·¼ÇÏ£¬ÄÄÒ»Ì죬ÄúÔÚ³´¹ÉʱÓöµ½¼±Ðè°ïÖúʱ£¬Îҿ϶¨»áÑ©ÖÐËÍÌ¿£º
[EMAIL PROTECTED]£¬[EMAIL PROTECTED]
²»ÊDz»¿ÉÄÜ£¬¶øÊÇûÓлú»áµÈ£»
²»ÊDz»ÐèÒª£¬Ö»ÊÇ»ðºòûË͵½£»
ÉÙ³éÒ»¸ùÑÌ£¬³´¹ÉÔÀ´ËÆÉñÏÉ¡£
Ò»¡¢×ʽ𲻶࣬ʱ¼ä²»¹»£¬¼¼ÊõÓÐÏÞ£¬ÏûÏ¢²»¾«£¬ÕÕÑùÕõÇ®µÄ°ÂÃîÔÚÄÄÀ
×ʽ𲻶࣬ʱ¼ä²»¹»£
click here to see more
°´ÕâÀï½øÈë
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Paul" == Paul D Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> Anyone know who is the keeper of the most official GNU
Paul> getloadavg.c? The one in GNU make, at least, has some serious
Paul> problems.
Tom> FWIW, I don't know. Files like th
(±¤°í)¼ö´É¿¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ °³ÀÎ ¿µ¾î ´Ü¾îÀå
º»ÀÎÀº ÇöÀç ¾È¾ç¿¡ ¼ÒÀçÇÑ ¸í¹® A°íµîÇб³ 3Çг⿡ Àڳฦ µÐ ºÎ¸ðÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ
±³Àç´Â Àڳ࿡°Ô ¸ÅÀÏ ¿µ´Ü¾î 100°³¾¿ Test ÇÏ¸é¼ Á¤¸®ÇÑ °ÍÀ», Á» ´õ
È¿À²ÀûÀ¸·Î °¡¸£Ä¡±â À§ÇÏ¿© ¾à 6°³¿ù°£ÀÇ ÀÛ¾÷À¸·Î Á¤¸®µÈ ´Ü¾îÀåÀÔ´Ï´Ù. È¥ÀÚ
°®°í Àֱ⿡´Â ¾Æ±î¿î ÀÚ·áÀ̱⿡ ³ª´©·Á°í ÇÕ
> "Harlan" == Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Harlan> So I have two projects that exhibit the behavior where I have
Harlan> the auto* tools installed and when I update, say, Makefile.am
Harlan> and re-run a make, I get the WARNING: `automake' is missing on
Harlan> your system... mess
> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
adl> Personally, I'd prefer that Automake generates Makefiles that
adl> shows *every* calls. This would make debuging (at any level) and
adl> bug reporting easier.
There's always a tension here. People argue vehemently in both
dir
> "Olaf" == olafBuddenhagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> That's too bad. You must not have run into the various bugs with the
>> old approach.
Olaf> What kind of bugs? And why is the new approach better in this
Olaf> regard?
Read the history:
http://sources.redhat.com/automake/depe
> "Rob" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> I hacked up an import command. It was simply a variant on include, that
Rob> appended the include prefix to any relative paths. It worked so-so, but
Rob> I didn't have time to make it work well enough to submit it. Anyway, for
Rob> so
> "Skip" == Skip Montanaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Skip> After executing "make distclean" a directory named
Skip> autom4te.cache is left over. It appears it's created by
Skip> autoconf 2.53. Whose job is it to see it gets deleted?
Skip> Shouldn't generated distclean target take care of
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Tromey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 9:15 AM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: Richard Boulton; Harlan Stenn; Automake
> Subject: Re: monolithic Makefile.am
>
>
> > "Rob" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> I loo
=?GB2312?B?t9DFz6KhraGt?=
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;GB2312;
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 13:29:08 +0800
X-Priority: 3
X-Library: Indy 8.0.25
×ð¾´µÄÏÈÉú/С½ã ÄúºÃ£¡
¡¡»¶ÓÄú³ÉΪ¡¶ÉÌÖÇÍøÉÏÓªÏúÌ×¼þ¡·http://www.webpost.com.cn
µÄÃâ
Title: waterwerx
CLICK HERE!
Dear Friend:
Over 95% of adults do not swim. And most adults will not even
admit it! A non-swimming adult, who suffers a
heart attack, stroke or other disabling affliction, which shuts down their
normal form o
12 matches
Mail list logo
