click here to see more
°´ÕâÀï½øÈë
On Mon, 2002-05-06 at 06:30, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Nowadays we could probably implement pattern rules purely in automake.
> Back in the old days we didn't have the machinery to allow this.
> Automake itself was too primitive. But now it would be more possible,
> if someone were motivated. Maybe th
Am Die, 2002-05-07 um 10.26 schrieb Alex Hornby:
> On Mon, 2002-05-06 at 06:30, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > Nowadays we could probably implement pattern rules purely in automake.
> > Back in the old days we didn't have the machinery to allow this.
> > Automake itself was too primitive. But now it would
>>> "Alex" == Alex Hornby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Alex> Certainly would. The problem I had with suffix rules, was that one
Alex> invocation of the idl compiler on one .idl file expands into many .h and
Alex> .cpp files, therefore I needed a suffix rule for each product. So far so
A
