> The problem we have is ucd-snmp choked on autoconf 2.52 and forced us
> to roll back to 2.13. With autoconf 2.13 we cannot upgrade the
> automake to 1.6 which requires autoconf 2.52. Can you see the problem
> now?
I often have fun with this kind of incompatibility. I'm no expert, but
I've fou
> "Ben" == Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> You may want to have a look at my packaging of Autoconf 2.13
Ben> and Autoconf 2.52 for Debian, which includes an heuristic
Ben> that automatically picks the right version of Autoconf to run
Ben> in most cases.
Thanks for
Hi Jens,
>>> "Jens" == Jens Krüger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jens> After configuring, make and make check I got three errors:
Jens> FAIL: pr300-lib.test
Jens> FAIL: pr300-ltlib.test
Jens> FAIL: pr300-prog.test
Could you send us the ouput of
make check VERBOSE=x TESTS='pr300-lib.test p
I got same FAIL messages for pr300-*.test.
OS: Linux 2.4.4
SHELL: GNU bash, version 2.04.26(1)-release (i586-redhat-linux-gnu)
PERL: This is perl, v5.6.0 built for i586-linux
autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.52
Do you need any other infomations?
Thanks
---
$ make check VERBOSE=x TESTS='pr300-lib.test
Hi Alexandre,
the output of uname -a is:
Linux sisyphos 2.4.10 #1 Thu Oct 4 11:01:39 CEST 2001 i686 unknown
I'm using bash as shell:
bash --version gives:
GNU bash, version 2.05.0(1)-release (i386-suse-linux)
Copyright 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
additionally I use autoconf and libtool
> configure.in:8: error: `Makefile' is already registered with
> AC_CONFIG_FILES or AC_OUTPUT.
Thanks! This is a bug in the testsuite that you can safely ignore.
(Akim: any idea why CVS Autoconf does not print this error anymore?)
I'm checking in the following fix.
Index: ChangeLog
Thaks for your patch, and I got below!
===
All 360 tests behaved as expected (4 expected failures)
===
I'm now using Automake-1.6.
--
Nishio Futoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Lars" == Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> New in 1.6:
>> * Autoconf 2.52 is required.
Lars> That's bad. I have no intention yet to switch my projects to 2.5x.
This is what made this release "1.6" instead of "1.5.1".
Tom
Hi Alexandre,
with this changes all test work correctly
Thanks
Jens
Am Donnerstag, 7. März 2002 13:31 schrieb Alexandre Duret-Lutz:
> > configure.in:8: error: `Makefile' is already registered with
> > AC_CONFIG_FILES or AC_OUTPUT.
>
> Thanks! This is a bug in the testsuite that you can safe
Paul Lew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Ben" == Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ben> You may want to have a look at my packaging of Autoconf 2.13
> Ben> and Autoconf 2.52 for Debian, which includes an heuristic
> Ben> that automatically picks the right version of Auto
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Paul" == Paul Lew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> 383 - @AMDEP_TRUE@@am__include@
@am__quote@$(DEPDIR)/SQLAllocHandle.Plo@am__quote@
Tom> This usually means you didn't re-run aclocal + autoconf, or
Tom> you ran the wrong
Es schrieb Paul Lew:
>
> > "Ben" == Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ben> You may want to have a look at my packaging of Autoconf 2.13
> Ben> and Autoconf 2.52 for Debian, which includes an heuristic
> Ben> that automatically picks the right version of Autoconf to run
>
I am newbie in using automake/autoconf programs.
I am running into the following problem. Any help is really appreciated
I initially had a working system in my machine, with autoconf version 2.13
Then when I created new source(.c) files in my tree, I read the documentation
to generate new makefiles
13 matches
Mail list logo
