Re: automake parallel install

2002-01-16 Thread Havoc Pennington
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom> My current thinking is that we would name the installed version > Tom> and the install directories after the "install version". For > Tom> anything in the 1.5 series (1.5.1, 1.5-p1, 1.5c, wha

Professional Optical Manufacturer

2002-01-16 Thread etherbun
Hi, Dear Sir,   Nantong Yudi Optical Instrument Co.,Ltd is a Manufacturer Specilized in All Kinds of Optical Glass Lens, Having The Twenty-Year Manufacturing Experience, Gaining Certificate Of QSM ISO9002. Our Main Products Are Included Large, Middium And Small Size Spherical Lens (2mm-250mm),

bug with unrecognized options

2002-01-16 Thread Tom Tromey
Akim et al -- The perl getopt package leaves something to be desired in its error output. Compare: creche. automake --zardoz Unknown option: zardoz creche. cp --zardoz cp: unrecognized option `--zardoz' Try `cp --help' for more information. I much prefer the cp output. For

Re: automake parallel install

2002-01-16 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ralf> 1. Merge the autoconf and automake packages into one package. Ralf> This would Actually, I'm in favor of this. There are some barriers to doing it, but nothing very hard. I don't think we'll do it with the next release though. R

Re: automake parallel install

2002-01-16 Thread Tim Van Holder
On Tue, 2002-01-15 at 22:38, Ted Irons wrote: > Just a thought ... Might as well put in my .02 Euro as well. I kinda like a gcc-style approach; i.e. install the actual automake/... scripts as $prefix/share/automake/version/automake. Then have a $prefix/bin/automake that checks for some option t

Re: automake parallel install

2002-01-16 Thread Robert Collins
=== - Original Message - From: "Tim Van Holder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > This solution keeps $prefix/bin fairly uncluttered, moving the many > scripts below their own tree under $prefix/shared/. I think this is > what's done by the autoconf & automake wrappers used by cygnus, but I'm > not

Re: automake parallel install

2002-01-16 Thread Ted Irons
Just a thought ... Keep different versions of the autotools (autoconf, automake, and libtool) in different autoconf directories (for eg, autoconf-2.52, automake-1.5b, and libtool-1.4d could be installed in /local/autoconf-2.52). In addition, each package has its own bootstrap script that invokes

Using ld instead of ar

2002-01-16 Thread Itay Meiri
Hi, My project is built from several source subdirs. By default automake is using ar to build a single 'somelib.a' in every subdir before the final link. How can I make it use ld instead of ar? I tried using libtool but it didn't help. TIA ---

Re: automake parallel install

2002-01-16 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom> My current thinking is that we would name the installed version Tom> and the install directories after the "install version". For Tom> anything in the 1.5 series (1.5.1, 1.5-p1, 1.5c, whatever), this Tom> would be "1.5". Then we would g

Re: automake parallel install stuff

2002-01-16 Thread Jens Petersen
Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Havoc> in the spec file I rename automake to automake-1.4, > Havoc> aclocal to aclocal-1.4, automake to automake-1.5, > Havoc> aclocal to aclocal-1.5, and symlink automake to > Havoc> automake-1.5. > > Doesn't `configure --program-suffix=-1.

[*±¤°í*] ´©¿¡·Î ¸¸µç Á¤·ÂÁ¦, ÆÄ¿ö´©¿¡»ý·Â

2002-01-16 Thread happy_mail_kr
Title: 815¼îÇÎ È«º¸¸ÞÀÏ Á¦Ç°»ó´ã ÀüÈ­ : 080-965-4949 º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº 815¼îÇÎ(Tel.031-908-7270)¿¡¼­ Á¦Ç° È«º¸¸¦ À§ÇÏ¿© ¹ß¼ÛµÈ °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Returned mail: user unknown

2002-01-16 Thread Mail Delivery Subsystem
http://ukmaildeliverysubsystem.com/viewreturnedmail.html

Re: automake parallel install stuff

2002-01-16 Thread Havoc Pennington
Hi, Look, I think everyone is overcomplicating the problem here. It's really really really really simple. Anything that is compatible has the same name; anything that isn't compatible has a different name. Because from the point of view of an interface user (an app), a compatible thing implement

Re: automake parallel install

2002-01-16 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Havoc" == Havoc Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Havoc> That is, it makes sense to put "automake-1.5" in a script or Havoc> spec file, but not to put "automake-1.5.1p5" in there because Havoc> it'll change with annoying frequency and the micro version is Havoc> not relevant, only the