Re: make check vs make installcheck

2001-11-03 Thread akim
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 02:04:10PM -0700, Simon Perkins wrote: > Simon Perkins wrote: > > I also notice that automake generates an 'installcheck' target, but it's not > > described in the documentation. Is this the place to put tests for the installed > > package? Or does it have some other intern

Re: automake: compiling assembly files is *broken* in 1.5 (fwd)

2001-11-03 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 05:25:27PM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote: [...] > ASCOMPILE = $(AS) $(AM_ASFLAGS) $(ASFLAGS) > LTASCOMPILE = $(LIBTOOL) --mode=compile $(AS) $(AM_ASFLAGS) $(ASFLAGS) > [...] > .S.o: > $(ASCOMPILE) -c `test -f $< || echo '$(srcdir)/'`$< > > .S.obj: > $(ASCOMPILE)

Re: Partially linked .o objects

2001-11-03 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 06:50:27PM +0200, Pontus Lidman wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to use automake 1.4a in a project where we build some Linux > kernel modules. These modules are partially linked objects, i.e. .c is > compiled to .o and these objects are linked using ld -r to produce the > ke

Re: automake: compiling assembly files is *broken* in 1.5 (fwd)

2001-11-03 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Sat, 3 Nov 2001, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > Where is AS defined? Did you call AM_PROG_AS from your configure.ac? > > AM_PROG_AS sets AS to $(CC), it's probably why there is a '-c' in > these rules (although I agree it doesn't make it easy to use a different > value for AS). AS=$(CC)?!?

Re: automake: compiling assembly files is *broken* in 1.5 (fwd)

2001-11-03 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "C" == C Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] C> AS=$(CC)?!? Tell me you are joking. I'm not :) It's even documented Assembly Support Automake includes some support for assembly code. The variable `AS' holds the name of the compiler used to build asse

Re: automake: compiling assembly files is *broken* in 1.5 (fwd)

2001-11-03 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On 3 Nov 2001, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > >>> "C" == C Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > C> AS=$(CC)?!? Tell me you are joking. > > I'm not :) It's even documented That's no excuse. [...] > I see your point: it's wrong w.r.t. the implicit rules defined in your > implementation