target name not known until configure time

2001-10-19 Thread mcmahill
how can I get someting like this to work? The suffix depends on the operating system and hardware platform. That requirement is set by something out of my control. I get complaints from automake about the constructs I've used in the pipestage_${MEXSFX}_SOURCES line. Thanks -Dan MEXSFX=@MEXS

Re: broken line continuation in DOS files

2001-10-19 Thread Wolfgang Liebich
Hi, I'm having very similar problems. I'm using a CM tool which "knows" about the difference in text files vs. binary files. The Windows client extracts all text files with "\r\n" line endings. So it doesn't matter which way I mount filesystems. Automake produces a very similar output than the e

Myopic depout.m4

2001-10-19 Thread F J Franklin
Hi, I don't know whether this is common knowledge or intended behaviour but: The AbiWord build system which uses 'Makefile' for a custom (non-automake) build and 'GNUmakefile[.{in|am}]' for building with automake+autoconf automake-1.5 is incompatible with this because it assumes (in depout.m4) t

Re: Automake and Sun's make

2001-10-19 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Martin" == Martin Frydl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> Hello, I've encountered problem when using automake generated Martin> makefiles with Sun's make. Martin> When VPATH is used with Sun's make, it changes Martin> filenames in rules. Lets have a makefile like this: This is

Re: Automake and Sun's make

2001-10-19 Thread Martin Frydl
Akim Demaille wrote: > > > "Martin" == Martin Frydl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Martin> Hello, I've encountered problem when using automake generated > Martin> makefiles with Sun's make. > > Martin> When VPATH is used with Sun's make, it changes > Martin> filenames in rules. Let

Re: Automake and Sun's make

2001-10-19 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Martin" == Martin Frydl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> This is precisely why we don't support VPATH onm SunOS. So don't >> use it, and let Automake to without. s/to/do/, sorry. Martin> I'm surely missing something here, but my patch seems to work Martin> fine. What are other problems wh

Uprgrad problems

2001-10-19 Thread Thomas Nagler
Dear all: By upgrading automake I get now the following errors: I used: Autoconf version 2.13 automake (GNU automake) 1.4a and upgraded to: Autoconf version 2.13 automake (GNU automake) 1.5 my bootstrap file looks like: aclocal -I m4 autoconf acconfig autoheadercreating aux/p2t/Ma

SEXWEB NO.1 .. MEGAWEB-SEX !

2001-10-19 Thread HOTBABES
Dear Ladies & Gentlemen, Welcome to the GREATEST SEX SHOW on the ENTIRE NET ! We now offer you to ENTER the World´s No.1 voted SEX-SERVER on the WEB ! By far the largest and most incredible content of LIVE SEX is now served to users WORLDWIDE! EVERYTHING is offered 100% ANONOMOUSLY & you don

Re: Automake and Sun's make

2001-10-19 Thread Martin Frydl
> >> This is precisely why we don't support VPATH onm SunOS. So don't > >> use it, and let Automake to without. > > s/to/do/, sorry. > > Martin> I'm surely missing something here, but my patch seems to work > Martin> fine. What are other problems which lead to not support VPATH > Martin> on Sun

Re: Potential bash 2.05 issues with 'set'

2001-10-19 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Tim" == Tim Van Holder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > it is probably still worth mentioning in the autoconf manual's >> > section on portable shell programming. >> >> Yes, that makes sense. Tim> I'll whip up something tomorrow. Hi Tim! ;)

Re: Potential bash 2.05 issues with 'set'

2001-10-19 Thread Tim Van Holder
> >> > it is probably still worth mentioning in the autoconf manual's > >> > section on portable shell programming. > >> > >> Yes, that makes sense. > > Tim> I'll whip up something tomorrow. > > Hi Tim! ;) Hi Akim! As you well know, time is a relative concept (in fact, to me it's yesterday at