Re: Automake 1.5: Documentation generation

2001-10-08 Thread Jens Krüger
Hi Steve, Am Donnerstag, 4. Oktober 2001 17:55 schrieb Steve M. Robbins: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 10:07:36AM +0200, Lars von Wedel wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > > > I think the way you propose is the best alternative. Hoever, did you > > come > > up with some approach to clean up the documentation?

Re: [PATCH] IDL support for automake-1.5

2001-10-08 Thread Kyle F. Downey
> foo_SOURCE = foo.cc > foo_IDL_CC = foo-intf.idl > foo_IDL_JAVA = foo-java.idl > A nit: the point of IDL is that it's the same for all languages, so I think this is unnecessary. > The only issue that remains then is whether or not all idl compiler > support specifying the output extension to b

Re: [PATCH] IDL support for automake-1.5

2001-10-08 Thread Alex Hornby
On Mon, 2001-10-08 at 15:50, Kyle F. Downey wrote: > It's actually even more complicated. > > CORBA support is a huge mess similar to the diversity of UNIX flavors > that led to the creation of the autotools suite in the first place. Proper > CORBA support in autotools would require a new subsys

automake / autoconf

2001-10-08 Thread Johannes Feigl
hi ...   i cannot unterstand the usage of autoconf & automake   is it possible that anybody would help me ?   for this software: the ./configure-scrpit should be made with autoconf   www.mplayer.dev.hu   thx mfg Johannes  

AC_PATH_X

2001-10-08 Thread Ted Irons
On a Linux-2.4 machine using the following AC_PATH_X AC_LANG_PUSH(C) AC_CHECK_LIB(Xmu, XmuLookupStandardColormap,,, -lXt -lX11) AC_CHECK_LIB(X11, XCreateWindow) AC_LANG_POP(C) I get checking for X... libraries /usr/X11/lib, headers checking for XmuLookupStandardColormap in -lXmu... no