Hi Steve,
I think the way you propose is the best alternative. Hoever, did you
come
up with some approach to clean up the documentation? As far as I know,
there is no such thing like a clean-hook...
Lars
"Steve M. Robbins" wrote:
>
> On the topic of automatically-generated documentation, how
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 10:07:36AM +0200, Lars von Wedel wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> I think the way you propose is the best alternative. Hoever, did you
> come
> up with some approach to clean up the documentation? As far as I know,
> there is no such thing like a clean-hook...
Though I didn't worry
Title: ¢À ½ÅÁö½ÄÀÎ ÃÊû °¿¬È¸ ¢À
¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä. º»¸ÞÀÏÀº °¿¬È¸ È«º¸¸¦ À§ÇÏ¿© 1ȸ¼º ¸ÞÀÏÀÌ¸ç ¸ÞÀÏ È¨ÆäÀÌÁö¿Í °Ô½ÃÆÇ¿¡¼
¼öÁýµÈ°ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù
¢À ½ÅÁö½ÄÀÎ ÃÊû
°¿¬È¸ ¢À
Á¤º¸È ½Ã´ë¿¡ ÁöÀû
È£±â½ÉÀÌ ¸¹Àº ´ç½Å !!½ÅÁö½ÄÀÎ ÃÊû
¹«·á °
Hello,
I'm trying to use automake 1.4a in a project where we build some Linux
kernel modules. These modules are partially linked objects, i.e. .c is
compiled to .o and these objects are linked using ld -r to produce the
kernel module.
However I can't seem to make it work. There seems to be no ex
So I've been doing some digging and I don't see how to work around this
problem.
automake-1.5 will not let me override RECURSIVE-TARGETS.
I've added empty rulesets for:
dvi:
dvi-am:
dvi-recursive:
and distcheck is *still* trying to do a "make dvi" in the SUBDIR.
Ideas?
In the fragment bel
