Using a recent CVS automake (checked out at Thu May 31 14:41:26 BST 2001),
and autoconf 2.50, I find that I now need to define ASFLAGS and AS in my
configure.{in,ac} in order to compile assembly sources. This seems
entirely reasonable; I just have two questions:
i) Is there any documentation of
> "Richard" == Richard Boulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> i) Is there any documentation of this yet? I couldn't find
Richard> any, and simply had to guess what to do from error messages
Richard> and sources.
There isn't. I'm working on documentation. Thanks for mentioning
thi
I think right now automake should have enough machinery that you could
write a single Makefile.am for an entire project. This ought to have
some performance benefits for the build. Has anybody tried this in a
serious way? I'm curious to hear about experiences.
Last night I gave some thought t
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:09:49AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I think right now automake should have enough machinery that you could
> write a single Makefile.am for an entire project. This ought to have
> some performance benefits for the build.
Wouldn't one lose the ability to remake just a si
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 02:29:37PM -0400, Eric Siegerman wrote:
> Wouldn't one lose the ability to remake just a single module, as
> opposed to the entire project?
No: one could easily put (very small) stub makefiles in each directory,
which simply call the top-level makefile to build just the ta
> "Richard" == Richard Boulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> You would lose the ability to build only sources in a
Richard> directory and its subdirs while ignoring files they depended
Richard> upon elsewhere in the tree which are out of date, but I'd
Richard> consider that a feature r
