# Guess values for system-dependent variables and create Makefiles.
-# Generated automatically using autoconf version 2.13
-# Copyright (C) 1992, 93, 94, 95, 96 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+# Generated by Autoconf 2.49f.
Automake uses stock 2.13.
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> Well, I have no experience at all in this area, so here is my
Akim> proposal. I must leave now, sorry I didn't write the full
Akim> ChangeLog. Of course I will.
Akim> Tom?
Tom
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Russ> You seem to have based this on an older version of Class::Struct
Russ> than what shipped with Perl 5.6.1,
I was not aware 5.6.1 was released...
Russ> unless you intended to delete the import stuff, and beyond that
Russ> the only ch
Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hm, that's weird... Here is what I meant to send (maybe I took the
> wrong floppy...)
Ah... yes, that looks much more like what I'd expect and should make it
work fine on Perl 5.005.
I wonder if they'd be accepted back so that you didn't have to incl
Title: RE: PATCH: Fix dependency tracking
Automakers:
I posted the patch to demonstrate the problem rather than
get the exact changes I made incorporated into Automake
(hence no ChangeLog entry). The one thing I'm particularly
suspicious of is how to get automake.in's instance of @AMDEP_TRU
Hello, Patrick!
> I just did a cvs checkout of automake, all the tests pass, but believe it
> or not:
In fact, installsh.test fails, but it's an _expected_ failure.
I'm probably missing something, since I have no time to catch up with
the mailing list, but what's wrong with the forward declarat
> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pavel> This patch has been tested with Perl perl5.005_03 and 5.6.0. Ok
Pavel> to apply?
Fine with me.
> "David" == David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> I'll immediately confess to not having followed the details of
David> the voluminous email exchange over the last couple of weeks.
Bad guy :)
David> But in the early stages of this discussion (before we got
David> swamped with licens
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> * automake.in (@conditional_stack): Rename as... (@cond_stack):
Akim> this. (&file_contents_internal): Support inclusion of files.
Tom> This patch is ripe for justification. I
Pavel> This patch has been tested with Perl perl5.005_03 and 5.6.0. Ok
Pavel> to apply?
Akim> Fine with me.
Me too. Thanks.
Tom
On 24 Apr 2001, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > "David" == David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> David> Could you briefly summarise, please, what happened to that
> David> potentially very clean approach? Thanks.
>
> I did answer to this. By no means I will ever ask someone to
> downgrade he
On 24 Apr 2001, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Pavel> This patch has been tested with Perl perl5.005_03 and 5.6.0. Ok
> Pavel> to apply?
>
> Akim> Fine with me.
>
> Me too. Thanks.
Applied after a short fight with CVS. The version you are using on
sourceware.cygnus.com tends to commit only some of the fil
In current automake, if a variable is defined in terms of N conditionally
defined variables, an array of possible combinations of conditional values
is generated. This array is, of course, of size 2^N, which implies that
only small numbers of conditionals can effectively be used together.
The gs
Hello!
This patch eliminates pushing undefined values to an array of suffixes to
be cleaned for texinfo files.
This fixes the warnings automake produces when it's run on the CVS
Libtool sources.
ChangeLog:
* automake.in (scan_texinfo_file): Don't push undefined values
to @clean_
Title: *»çÀ̹ö°ÁÂ(»ùÇÃÆ÷ÇÔ)¸¦µéÀ¸½Ã·Á¸éGVA¸¦¼³Ä¡ÇϼžßÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ah... yes, that looks much more like what I'd expect and should make it
> work fine on Perl 5.005.
> I wonder if they'd be accepted back so that you didn't have to include
> your own.
That wasn't what I meant to say (and it doesn't make any sense; you
On 23 Apr 2001, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> Well, I have no experience at all in this area, so here is my
> proposal. I must leave now, sorry I didn't write the full ChangeLog.
> Of course I will.
>
> Tom? Russ, I'd be reassured if you could comment.
>
> make check and make distcheck are happy.
17 matches
Mail list logo